اثر کاربرد تلفیقی کودهای شیمیایی و آلی بر فتوسنتز، رشد و عملکرد در کشت مخلوط ذرت و شنبلیله

نوع مقاله : مقاله کامل علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری اگروتکنولوژی-اکولوژی گیاهان زراعی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان، همدان، ایران،

2 دانشیار، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان، همدان، ایران،

چکیده

سابقه و هدف: کشت مخلوط ذرت و شنبلیله به‌عنوان یکی از کشت‌های تابستانه، با توجه به افزایش کارایی استفاده از منابع از اهمیت بسیاری برخوردار است. از این رو، هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی تأثیر کاربرد تلفیقی کودهای دامی، بیوچار و شیمیایی بر رشد، صفات مرتبط با فتوسنتز و عملکرد کشت مخلوط ذرت و شنبلیله بود.
مواد و روش‌ها: آزمایش به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی در سال‌های زراعی 1398 و 1399 در مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی شهرستان مهران واقع در استان ایلام اجرا شد. الگوهای مختلف کشت در چهار سطح (کشت خالص ذرت، کشت خالص شنبلیله، کشت‌ مخلوط یک ردیف ذرت: دو ردیف شنبلیله، کشت‌ مخلوط سه ردیف ذرت: شش ردیف شنبلیله) و کاربرد کود در شش سطح (عدم مصرف کود (شاهد)، کود دامی، بیوچار، NPK توصیه شده، 50 درصد NPK + 50 درصد کود دامی، 50 درصد NPK + 50 درصد بیوچار) فاکتورهای آزمایشی بودند. صفات مورد مطالعه شامل تعداد ردیف دانه در بلال، تعداد دانه در ردیف، وزن هزار دانه، عملکرد دانه و عملکرد بیولوژیک ذرت و تعداد غلاف در بوته، وزن هزار دانه، عملکرد دانه و عملکرد بیولوژیک شنبلیله بودند. جهت ارزیابی سودمندی کشت مخلوط نسبت به کشت خالص از شاخص‌های نسبت برابری زمین، نسبت معادل سطح زیر کشت و زمان و کارایی استفاده از زمین محاسبه شد. تجزیه واریانس مرکب داده‌ها توسط نرم افزار آماری SAS صورت گرفت. مقایسه میانگین‌ها با استفاده از آزمون LSD در سطح آماری پنج درصد توسط نرم افزار SAS انجام شد. رسم نمودارها نیز توسط نرم افزار Excel 2013 انجام شد.
یافته‌ها: اثرات اصلی و متقابل کود و کشت مخلوط بر عملکرد دانه و بیولوژیک، سرعت تعرق، غلظت دی اکسید کربن زیر روزنه و سرعت فتوسنتز خالص ذرت و شنبلیله در سطح احتمال یک درصد معنی‌دار شد. با اینکه کشت مخلوط سبب کاهش عملکرد و صفات فیزیولوژیکی گیاهان زراعی گردید ولی کاربرد کودهای بیوچار و کود دامی به جز غلظت دی اکسید کربن زیر روزنه موجب بهبود صفات زراعی و فیزیولوژیکی شد. بیشترین عملکرد دانه ذرت و شنبلیله (به‌ترتیب 914 و 7/81 گرم در مترمربع) از کشت خالص آن‌ها و به‌ترتیب با کاربرد کود دامی و بیوچار به‌دست آمد. در بین تیمارهای کشت مخلوط، بیشترین عملکرد دانه ذرت و شنبلیله (به‌ترتیب 506 و 1/58 گرم در مترمربع) به‌ترتیب از کشت مخلوط یک ردیف ذرت: دو ردیف شنبلیله با کاربرد کود شیمیایی و کشت مخلوط سه ردیف ذرت: شش ردیف شنبلیله با کاربرد بیوچار حاصل شد. شاخص‌های نسبت برابری زمین و کارایی استفاده از زمین سودمندی کشت مخلوط ذرت با شنبلیله را تأیید کردند.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج آزمایش نشان داد که کشت مخلوط یک ردیف ذرت: دو ردیف شنبلیله و کاربرد 50 درصد کود شیمیایی به همراه 50 درصد کود دامی موجب بهبود مجموع عملکرد گردید و بیشترین میزان شاخص‌های نسبت برابری زمین و کارایی استفاده از زمین را داشت. از این رو این الگوی کشت ضمن بهبود کارایی استفاده از منابع و کاهش مصرف کود شیمیایی، قابل توصیه به کشاورزان است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of the combined use of chemical and organic fertilizers on photosynthesis, growth and yield, in corn and fenugreek intercropping

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamzeh Miri 1
  • Javad Hamzei 2
1 Ph.D. student in Agrotechnology-Ecology of Crop Plants, Boali Sina University, Hamedan, Hamedan, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Boali Sina University, Hamedan, Hamedan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Background and objectives: The intercropping of corn and fenugreek is an important summer crop due to increase in the efficiency of using resources. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of combined application of animal, biochar and chemical fertilizers on the growth, photosynthesis and performance of intercropping of corn and fenugreek.
Materials and methods: The experiment was conducted during the agricultural years of 2019 and 2020 at the Agricultural Research Center in Mehran city, located in Ilam province. It followed a factorial experiment and employed a randomized complete block design. The experiment consisted of different cultivation patterns at four levels: pure corn cultivation, pure fenugreek cultivation, and mixed crops with ratios of 2:1 and 6:3 (corn row: fenugreek row). Fertilizer application was also considered with six levels: no fertilizer used (control), animal manure, biochar, recommended NPK, 50% NPK + 50% animal manure, and 50% NPK + 50% biochar. These factors were studied in combination to evaluate their effects on the outcomes of the experiment. In this experiment, traits such as the number of rows per ear, number of grains per row, thousand grain weight, grain yield, and biological yield of corn, as well as the number of pods per plant, thousand grain weight, grain yield, and biological yield of fenugreek, were calculated. To evaluate the profitability of intercropping compared to pure cultivation, indicators such as land equality ratio, area time equation ratio, and land use efficiency were used. Variance analysis of data and mean comparison was conducted using SAS 9.4 statistical software. Graphs were generated using Excel 2013 software.
Results: The main and interaction effects of fertilizer application and intercropping on grain and biological yield, transpiration rate, carbon dioxide concentration under the stomata, and net photosynthesis rate of corn and fenugreek were significant at the 1% probability level. Although intercropping led to a reduction in crop yield and physiological characteristics, the application of biochar fertilizers and cattle manure had a positive impact on these traits, except for the carbon dioxide concentration under stomata, which remained unchanged. The highest grain yields of corn and fenugreek were achieved through sole cropping and with the use of chemical fertilizer and biochar, respectively (914 and 81.7 grams per square meter, respectively). Among the intercropping treatments, the highest grain yields of corn and fenugreek (506 and 58.1 grams per square meter, respectively) were observed in the intercropping of one row of corn to two rows of fenugreek with the use of chemical fertilizers, and in the intercropping of three rows of corn to six rows of fenugreek with the use of biochar, respectively. The indices of land equality ratio, and the efficiency of land use confirmed the benefits of corn and fenugreek intercropping.
Conclusion: The results of the experiment showed that the intercropping of one row of corn: two rows of fenugreek and the use of 50% of chemical fertilizers along with 50% of cattle manure led to the improvement of the yield, and it had the highest indicses of the land equivalent ratio, and land use efficiency. Therefore, this cultivation pattern is recommended to farmers while improving the efficiency of resources and reducing the consumption of chemical fertilizers.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Intercropping؛ Corn؛ Fenugreek؛ Yield
  • ؛ Land equivalent ratio

مراجع

  1. Aznar-Sánchez, J. , Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., García-Arca, D., & López-Felices, B. (2020). Identification of opportunities for applying the circular economy to intensive agriculture in Almería (South-East Spain). Agricultural Journal, 10(10), 1499.
  2. Debbarma, A., & Debbarma, A. (2018). Perspectives on Rubber Monoculture in Tripura, North-East India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 44(1), 27-31.
  3. Liu, C. C., Kuchma, O., & Krutovsky, K. V. (2018). Mixed-species versus monocultures in plantation forestry: Development, benefits, ecosystem services and perspectives for the future. Global Ecology and Conservation, 15, e00419.
  4. Brooker, R. , Bennett, A. E., Cong, W. F., Daniell, T. J., George, T. S., Hallett, P.D., & Li, L. (2015). Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology, and ecology. New Phytologist, 206(1), 107-117.
  5. Duchene, O., Vian, J. , & Celette, F. (2017). Intercropping with legume for agroecological cropping systems: Complementarity and facilitation processes and the importance of soil microorganisms. A review. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 240, 148-161.
  6. Bedoussac, L., Journet, E. , Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Naudin, C., Corre-Hellou, G., Jensen, E. S., Justes, E. (2015). Ecological principles underlying the increase of productivity achieved by cereal-grain legume intercrops in organic farming. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35, 911–935.
  7. Abera, T., Tufa, T., Midega, T., Kumbi, H., & Tola, B. (2018). Effect of Integrated Inorganic and Organic Fertilizers on Yield and Yield Components of Barley in Liben Jawi District. International Journal of Agronomy, 97(1), 1-6.
  8. Agegnehu, G., Nelson, P. , & Bird, M. I. (2016). Crop yield, plant nutrient uptake and soil physicochemical properties under organic soil amendments and nitrogen fertilization on Nitisols. Soil and Tillage Research, 160, 1-13.
  9. Doan, T. , Henry-des-Tureaux, T., Rumpel, C., Janeau, J. L., & Jouquet, P. (2015). Impact of compost, vermicompost and biochar on soil fertility, maize yield and soil erosion in Northern Vietnam: a three-year mesocosm experiment. Science of the Total Environment, 514, 147-154.
  10. Veljković, V. , Biberdžić, M. O., Banković-Ilić, I. B., Djalović, I. G., Tasić, M. B., Nježić, Z. B., & Stamenković, O.S. (2018). Biodiesel production from corn oil: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 91, 531-548.
  11. Costa, N. , Crusciol, C. A., Trivelin, P. C., Pariz, C. M., Costa, C., Castilhos, A. M., Moretti, L. G. (2021). Recovery of 15N fertilizer in intercropped maize, grass, and legume and residual effect in black oat under tropical conditions. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 310, 107226.
  12. Zaefarian, F., Mirnemati, H., & Akbarpour, V. (2021). Investigation biochemical characteristics and yield of savory (Satureja hortensis) and fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) in intercropping conditions with simultaneous weed competition. Journal of Plant Production Research, 28(4), 1-23.
  13. Sharma, N. , Singh, R. J., Mandal, D., Kumar, A., Alam, N. M., & Keesstra, S. (2017). Increasing farmer’s income and reducing soil erosion using intercropping in rainfed maize-wheat rotation of Himalaya, India. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 247, 43-53.
  14. Choudhary, M., Panday, S. , Meena, V. S., Singh, S., Yadav, R. P., Mahanta, D., Pattanayak, A. (2018). Long-term effects of organic manure and inorganic fertilization on sustainability and chemical soil quality indicators of soybean-wheat cropping system in the Indian mid-Himalayas. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 257, 38-46.
  15. Meena, B. , Biswas, A. K., Singh, M., Chaudhary, R. S., Singh, A. B., Das, H., & Patra, A. K. (2019). Long-term sustaining crop productivity and soil health in maize–chickpea system through integrated nutrient management practices in Vertisols of central India. Field Crops Research, 232, 62-76.
  16. Mansouri, L., Jamshidi, K., Rastgoo, M., Saba, J., & Mansouri, H. (2013). The effect of additive maize-bean intercropping on yield, yield components, and weeds control in Zanjan climate Conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Research, 11(3), 483- 492. (In Persian).
  17. Banik, P., Midya, A., Sarkar, B. , & Ghose, S. S. (2006). Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: Advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of Agronomy, 24(4), 325- 332.
  18. Huang, M., Zhai, P., & Piao, S. (2021). Divergent responses of ecosystem water use efficiency to drought timing over Northern Eurasia. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 045016.
  19. Hasan, M.K., Xing, Q.F., Zhou, C.Y., Wang, K.X., Xu, T., Yang, P., Zhou, J. (2023). Melatonin mediates elevated carbon dioxide‐induced photosynthesis and thermo tolerance in tomato. Journal of Pineal Research, 74(3), e12858.
  20. Li, G., Xiao, W., Yang, T., & Lyu, T. (2023). Optimization and process effect for microalgae carbon dioxide fixation technology applications based on carbon capture: A comprehensive review. Carbon, 9(1), 35.
  21. Moroney, J. , Long, B. M., McCormick, A. J., & Raven, J. A. (2023). Special issue on inorganic carbon concentrating mechanisms. Photosynthesis Research, 156, 179-180.
  22. Ramírez-Parra, E., & De la Rosa, L. (2023). Designing Novel Strategies for Improving Old Legumes: An Overview from Common Vetch. Plants, 12(6), 1275.
  23. Ghaderimokri, L., Rezaei-Chiyaneh, E., Ghiyasi, M., Gheshlaghi, M., Battaglia, M. , & Siddique, K. H. (2022). Application of humic acid and biofertilizers changes oil and phenolic compounds of fennel and fenugreek in intercropping systems. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 5946.
  24. Bhattacharyya, R., Pandey, A. , Gopinath, K. A., Mina, B. L., Bisht, J. K., & Bhatt, J. C. (2016). Fertilization and crop residue addition impacts on yield sustainability under a rainfed maize–wheat system in the Himalayas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences India Section B: Biological Sciences, 86(1), 21-32.
  25. Havlin, J. , Tisdale, S. L., Nelson, W. L., & Beaton, J. D. (2016). Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. Pearson Education India.
  26. Singh, J., & Kaur, A. (2015). Vermicompost as a strong buffer and natural adsorbent for reducing transition metals, BOD, COD from industrial effluent. Ecological Engineering, 74, 13-19.
  27. Xin, X., Zhang, J., Zhu, A., & Zhang, C. (2016). Effects of long-term (23 years) mineral fertilizer and compost application on physical properties of fluvo-aquic soil in the North China Plain. Soil and Tillage Research, 156, 166-172.
  28. Chaoui, R., Boudsocq, S., Taschen, E., Sentenac, H., Farissi, M., & Lazali, M. (2023). Intercropping durum wheat and chickpea increases nutrient availability and use efficiency under low phosphorus soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 46, 4125-4139.
  29. Weih, M., Mínguez, M. , & Tavoletti, S. (2022). Intercropping systems for sustainable agriculture. Agricultural Journal, 12(2), 291.
  30. Kashtehgar, A., Dahmardeh, M., Galavi, M., & Khammari, E. (2015). Investigation of intercropping and sole cropping patterns of maize (Zea mays) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) on weed characteristics. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 46(4), 547-558.
  31. Wang, W., Li, M. , Gong, D. S., Zhou, R., Khan, A., Zhu, Y., Song, C. (2022). Water use of intercropped species: Maize-soybean, soybean-wheat, and wheat-maize. Agricultural Water Management, 269, 107690.
  32. Soratto, R. , Perdoná, M. J., Parecido, R. J., Pinotti, R. N., & Gitari, H. I. (2022). Turning biennial into biannual harvest: Long-term assessment of Arabica coffee–macadamia intercropping and irrigation synergism by biological and economic indices. Food and Energy Security, 11(2), e365.
  33. Erythrina, E., Susilawati, S., Slameto, S., Resiani, N. D., Arianti, F. D., Jumakir, J., Sembiring, H. (2022). Yield Advantage and Economic Performance of Rice–Maize, Rice–Soybean, and Maize–Soybean Intercropping in Rainfed Areas of Western Indonesia with a Wet Climate. Agronomy, 12(10), 2326.                                                                
مجله تولید گیاهان زراعی
دوره 17، شماره 2
تیر 1403
صفحه 31-52

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار