Evaluation of Energy Use Patterns and the Impact of Indigenous Knowledge in Rice Cultivation Systems of Gilan Province

Document Type : Complete scientific research article

Authors

1 Department of Rangeland Management, Faculty of rangeland and watershed management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

2 Department of Rangeland Management, Faculty of rangeland and watershed management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.

3 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of agricultural management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.

10.22069/ejcp.2026.24019.2707

Abstract

Abstract
Background and objectives: The imperative to conserve natural resources has intensified efforts towards optimizing energy management in agriculture. This study aimed to determine energy indexes, indigenous knowledge related to energy consumption, and economic analysis in the rice farming system of Gilan Province in 2022.
Materials and Methods: The study methodology involved collecting energy data using a semi-structured questionnaire from 30 households and 60 farmers in rice cultivation farms with dimensions of (<0.5, 0.5 to 1, and >1) hectare. The questionnaire encompassed questions regarding energy inputs such as seeds, fertilizer, manure, human labor, and agricultural machinery, as well as outputs including paddy rice and straw. Energy estimation was performed using coefficients and energy indices, including energy efficiency, energy productivity, specific energy, and net energy. The investigation of indigenous knowledge was conducted using an ethnographic approach, involving participatory observation and subsequent analysis through open coding with the aid of MAXQDA 2020 software.
Results: The average total input and output energy in the agricultural ecosystems were approximately 24087.08 and 75001.72 MJ ha-1year-1, respectively. The highest energy inputs were related to water (31%), nitrogen fertilizer (28%), and fuel (14%). Energy productivity and efficiency were 3.11 and 0.11 kg MJ-1, respectively. Also, specific energy was calculated as 9.57 MJ kg-1, and net energy as 50914.64 MJ ha-1 year-1. Renewable and non-renewable energy constituted 17% and 83%, and direct and indirect energy comprised 19% and 81%, respectively. Increasing farm size led to an increase in rice yield and energy indicators, which can be attributed to large-scale farm management. In the economic analysis, the total production value was 662,648,400 Rials ha-1year-1, and the net return was 240,374,610 Rails ha-1year-1. The benefit-cost ratio was 1.57, with the highest production costs associated with labor, seeds, and machinery. The indigenous knowledge of farmers concerning energy consumption in rice cultivation can be categorized into six main themes: land management, water management, organic fertilizer management, seed management, planting, and mechanization.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that rice cultivation in the target region maintains a positive energy and economic balance despite the considerable share of inputs such as water, nitrogen fertilizer, and fuel. Farm size expansion improved yield and energy indicators, underscoring the necessity of integrated and efficient management. To address the challenges of high input consumption, integrating indigenous knowledge with modern technologies is essential. Such an approach, supported by policy interventions and the adoption of efficient technologies, can enhance productivity and promote the long-term sustainability of rice production systems.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Mardani Najafabadi, M., Sabouni, M., Azadi, H., & Taki, M. (2022). Rice production energy efficiency evaluation in north of Iran; application of Robust Data Envelopment Analysis, Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 6,100356, ISSN 2666-7908, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100356.
  2. Hosseini, S., Sharifan, T., Kiani, H., Abyar, N., & Feyzbakhsh, M.T. (2022). Energy Flow and Global Warming Potential in Direct Seeded and Transplantation of Rice under Different Irrigation Systems. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture35(4), 337-356. Doi: 10.22092/ jwra.2021.355385.885. [In Persian]
  3. Pishgar-Komleh, S.H., Sefeedpari, P., & Rafiee, S. (2012). Energy and economic analysis of rice production under different farm levels in Guilan province of Iran, Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 58(3), 99–106.
  4. Yusefi, Z., Vahedi, A., & askari bozaieh, F. (2021). Energy consumption analysis and environmental Impact evaluation of rice production by life cycle assessment (LCA) in guilan province. Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research22(78), 55-72. Doi: 10.22092/erams. 2020.343427.1359. [In Persian]
  5. Yasari, E., Dastan, S., & Yadi, R. (2018). Evaluation of CO2 Emission Caused By Energy Consumption of Local Rice Cultivars in Mazandaran Province,Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production28 (4), 191-206. [In Persian].
  6. Nandini Dev, K., Singh Athokpam, H., Khamba Singh, K., Anandi Devi, M., & Gojendro Singh, O. (2020). Comparison of Energy Consumption for Different Sowing Techniques and Seed Rate of Direct Seeded Rice (Oryza sativa) under Medium Land Situation of Manipur. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences9 (3), 328-336. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.903.039.
  7. Alipour, A., Veisi, H., Darijani, F., Mirbagheri, B., & Behbahani, A.G. (2012). Study and determination of energy consumption to produce conventional rice of the Guilan province. Research in Agricultural Engineering58(3), 99-106. Doi: 10.17221/8/2011-RAE.
  8. Torabi Jafroodi, A., Adibi, S., & Hasanzade, A. (2015). Energy balance and Economical Analysis of Local and Improved Rice (Oryza Sativa) Cultivars in Guilan Province. Applied Field Crops Research, 28(106), 21-28. Doi: 10.22092/aj.2015.105672. [In Persian]
  9. Perera, M.H.K.R., Wickramasinghe, W. M. A. D. B., & De Silva, R. P. (2021). Energy efficiency and economic analysis of an irrigated rice farming system in Ampara District of Sri Lanka: An assessment for 2018/19 Maha season.Tropical Agricultural Research, 32(3), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v32i3.8489.
  10. Dugyon, E.M.C. (2024). Indigenous knowledge in traditional production of rice: Impact on food security in the upland households in Ifugao, Philippines. Plant Science Today. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.1864
  11. Rosada, I., Nurliani, A., Nurhapsa, F.D., & Sirajuddin S.N. (2024). Enhancing Indigenous Knowledge to Enhance Food Security in Rice Field Agroecosystems of Pinrang Regency, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. Advancements in Life Sciences.11 (1), 84-91.
  12. Taofeek, A. (2024). Integration of Indigenous Knowledge and Modern Practices in Upland Rice Cultivation.
  13. Arena, F, & Bailey, K. 2025. The Role of Indigenous Knowledge in Carbon Stewardship. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391848335.
  14. Eskandari Cherati, F., Hoshang Bahrami, H., & Asakereh, A. (2011). Energy survey of mechanized and traditional rice production system in Mazandaran Province of Iran, African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6 (11), 2565 - 2570, https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.516
  15. Kaur, R., Chhina, G.S., Kaur, M., Bhatt, R., Elhindi, K.M., & Mattar, M.A. (2024).Optimizing Nutrient and Energy Efficiency in a Direct-Seeded Rice Production System: A Northwestern Punjab Case Study. Agronomy, 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/ agronomy14040671.
  16. Singh, R.K. (2014). Indigenous Agricultural Knowledge in Rainfed Rice Based Farming Systems for Sustainable Agriculture: Learning from Indian Farmers. Indigenous Knowledge and Sustainable Agriculture Development, 101-111.
  17. Dhivya, C., Monika A, Jayashree V., & Kamali, S.P. (2024). The Role of Indigenous Knowledge in Sustainable Farming Practices, greenaria.in, 2 (10), 194-196. ISSN: 2584-153X, Article ID: G-24-1051
  18. Putu Sukanteri, N., Joshi, R.C., & Tamba,M. (2024). Cultivating Sustainable Agriculture: Traditional Wisdom in Balinese Rice Farming, https://doi.org/10.31220/agrirxiv.2024.00270
  19. Website Census of Population and Housing. (2016). Statistical Centre of Iran, available at https://amar.org.ir/statistical-information/statid/52277. [In Persian]
  20. Website General Directorate of Meteorology of Gilan Province. (2025). Available at https://www.gilmet.ir/fa/.
  21. Faruque, M.O., Uddin, S.B., Barlow, J.W. Hu, S., Dong, S., Cai, Q., Li, X. & Hu, X. (2018). Quantitative ethnobotany of medicinal plants used by indigenous communities in the bandarban district of Bangladesh. Front Pharmacol, 6, 9(40). Doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00040. PMID: 29467652; PMCID: PMC5808248.
  22. Erzse, A., Karim, S.A., Rwafa-Ponela, T.  Kruger, P., Hofman, K., Foley, L., Oni, T., & Goldstein, S. (2023). Participatory prioritisation of interventions to improve primary school food environments in Gauteng, South Africa. BMC Public Health23, 1263. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16101-z.
  23. Gundogmus, E. (2006). Energy use on organic farming: a comparative analysis on organic versus conventional apricot production on small holdings in Turkey. Energy Conversation Management, 47, 3351-3359.
  24. Iqbal, T. (2007). Energy input and output for production of Boro rice in Bangladesh. Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 7, 2717-2722.