Performance evaluation of imported seed-shattering resistant sesame genotype under different planting arrangements and densities in Gorgan

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

2 2- Assistant Professor, Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Gorgan, Iran.

3 Professor, Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Gorgan, Iran

4 1- Assistant Professor, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Like many other sesame-producing countries, Iran has numerous local sesame populations adapted to their respective production regions' climatic and soil conditions. However, these populations are not suitable for large-scale cultivation and mechanized farming. In 2016, a sesame genotype resistant to seed shattering was imported into the Iran suggesting its potential contribution to sesame cultivation programs in the country. Due to the lack of information regarding the appropriate planting arrangements and densities for this imported shatter-resistant genotype, especially in Golestan province, this research was conducted.
Materials and Methods: The experiment was carried out in 2020 and 2021 in the research fields of the Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (Gorgan), located at 54° 24' longitude and 36° 53' latitude, with an elevation of 5.5 meters above sea level and temperate climate with hot and dry summers. The experiment was set up as a split-plot design in an RCBD with three replications. The main plots consisted of three-row spacings (30, 45, and 60 cm), and the sub-plots included four plant spacings (5, 8, 11, and 14 cm). The morphological traits, yield components, seed yield, seed oil percentage, and oil yield of the imported shatter-resistant genotype were evaluated. The data were analyzed using a mixed model approach assuming the random effect of year, and the analysis was performed using SAS software version 9.4. Mean comparisons of main effects were conducted using the LSD test at a significance level of 5%, and in the case of significant interaction effects, mean separation and comparison were performed using the LS-means test.
Results: The results showed that in the first year, the tallest plants were obtained from the 60×8 cm planting arrangement (193 cm), while in the second year; the tallest plants were obtained from the 30×11 cm planting arrangement (211 cm). Increasing the planting density from 10 to 35 plants per square meter increased the plant height by 22 cm, but further increases in density due to increased competition decreased plant height. Furthermore, the highest number of capsules per plant (201 capsules) in the first year was obtained from the 60×14 cm planting arrangement, and in the second year (169 capsules), it was obtained from the 60×11 cm planting arrangement. Decreasing the distance between rows and plants, which corresponds to increased planting density, reduced the number of capsules per plant, the number of seeds per capsule, and the thousand-seed weight. The results indicated a significant interaction effect of row spacing and plant spacing on seed yield. The highest seed yield of 3025 kg.ha-1 was achieved with the 30×11 cm planting arrangement. Although increasing the planting density decreased the number of branches and yield components, this decrease was compensated for by increasing the number of plants per unit area, and the highest seed yield was obtained at a density of 30 plants per square meter. Additionally, the results showed that increasing the planting density beyond 30 plants per square meter led to a decrease in seed oil percentage.
Conclusion: The results of this study revealed that the average and maximum seed yield of the shatter-resistant genotype were approximately 3 and 4 times higher, respectively, compared to the average sesame yield in the Gorgan region. Therefore, considering the mechanized harvesting potential of this genotype and its high seed yield, it is recommended to cultivate this genotype using the 30×11cm planting arrangement and a density of 30 plants per square meter in the Gorgan region.

Keywords

Main Subjects


 1.Oloniruha, J.A., Ogundare, S.K. & Olajide, K. (2021). Growth and yield of sesame (Sesamum indicum) as influenced by plant population density and organo-mineral fertilizer rates. Agro-Science, 20(1), 15-21.
2.Raikwar, R.S. & Srivastva, P. (2013). Productivity enhancement of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) through improved production technologies. African Journal of. Agricultural Research, 8(47), 6073–6078.
3.Zhang, Y., Xu, Z., Li, J. & Wang, R. (2021). Optimum planting density improves resource use efficiency and yield stability of rainfed maize in semiarid climate. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 752606.
4.Roy, N., Abdullah-Mamun, S. M. & Sarwar-Jahan, M. (2009). Yield performance of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) varieties at varying levels of row spacing. Research journal of agriculture and biological sciences, 5(5), 823–827.
5.Latifi, H., Khorramdel, S., Nassiri Mahallati, M. & Farzaneh Belgerdi, M. R. (2018). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and plant density on yield and nitrogen efficiency indices of sesame using a central composite design. Journal of Plant Production Research, 25(3), 125-140. [In Persia]
6.Olowe, V.I.O. & Busari, L.D. (2003). Growth and grain yield of two sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) varieties as affected by row spacing in Southern Guinea savanna of Nigeria. Samaru: Journal of Agriculture Research, 19, 91-101.
7.Fanaie, H.R., Naroueirad, M.R. & Keshtkat, M.K. (2020). Evaluation of seed and oil production of sesame cultivars affected by row spacing and plant density. Journal of Plant Production Research, 27(3), 163-177. [In Persian]
8.Oztürk, O. & Şaman, O. (2012). Effects of different plant densities on the yield and quality of second crop sesame. International Journal of Biological, Biomolecular, Agricultural, Food and Biotechnological Engineering, 6(9), 644–649.
9.Jan, A., Ali, S., Adail, M. & Khan, A. (2014). Growth and yield components of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) as influenced by phosphorus levels under different row spacing. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 4(2), 150–154.
10.Ramazani, S.H.R. & Mansouri, S. (2017). Relationships of quantitative traits in advanced lines of sesame. Journal of Crop Breeding, 9(23), 58-66. [In Persian]
11.Sadeghi Garmaroodi, H., Gholamhoseini, M. & Habibzadeh, F. (2023). Sesame production challenges and approaches. Emam Khomeini International University Publication. Qazvin, Iran. 268 pp. [In Persian]
12.Langham, D. R. & Wiemers, T. (2002). Progress in mechanizing sesame in the US through breeding. In: J.Janick and A. Whipkey (eds.), Trends in new crops and new uses (pp. 157–173). Alexandria, VA: ASHS Press.
13.Mehdipour, H., Abbasi, R. & Abbasianh, A. (2017). Interaction of density and management of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) on sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) seed yield and weeds control. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 27(2), 37-48. [In Persian]
14.Mahdi, A.R.A.E.  & Alsayim, H.E. (2019). Influence of irrigation interval and plant population density on sesame growth and yield at high terrace soils. Nile Journal for Agricultural Sciences, 4(2), 1-10.
15.Samadzadeh, F., Pirzad, A.R. & Zeinalzadeh-Tabrizi, H. (2023). Effect of plant pattern and density on morphological characteristics and yield-related traits of non-dehiscent sesame cultivar. Journal of Crops Improvement, 25(1), 51-63. [In Persian]
16.Craine, J.M. &  Dybzinski, R. (2013). Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients, water and light. Functional Ecology, 27(4), 833-840.
17.Auwalu, B. M., Oseni, T. O., Okonkwo, C.A.C., Tenebe, V.A. & Pal, U. R. (1995). Influence of some agronomic practices on the growth and yield of vegetable sesame (Sesamum radiatum Schum.). Advances in Horticultural Science, 9(1), 33–36.
18.Karimi, Z., AghaAlikhani, M. & Gholamhoseini, M. (2018). Study of planting density on agronomic traits of sesame cultivars. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 16(4), 821- 831. [In Persian]
19.Xu, C., Huang, S., Tian, B., Ren, J., Meng, Q. & Wang, P. (2017). Manipulating planting density and nitrogen fertilizer application to improve yield and reduce environmental impact in Chinese maize production. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1234.
20.Li, X., Han, Y., Wang, G., Feng, L., Wang, Z., Yang, B., Du, W., Lei, Y., Xiong, S., Zhi, X., Xing, F., Fan, Z., Xin, M. & Li, Y. (2020). Response of cotton fruit growth, intraspecific competition and yield to plant density. European Journal of Agronomy, 114, 125991.
21.Yanegh, A., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., Zarghani, H. & Mohammadian, M. (2013). Assessment of above- and below-ground competition between sesame (Sesamume indicum L.) and pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and its effects on sesame yield and yield components. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 11(1), 88-96. [In Persian]