Evaluation the effect of salinity stress on the protein and micronutrient elements content of quinoa seeds

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, National Salinity Research Center, Agricultural Education and Extension Research Organization, Yazd, Iran.

2 National Salinity Research Center Nahalestan Ave. Airport Bulevard

Abstract

Introduction: Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) belongs to the Amaranth family and is native to the Andes. In recent decades, the cultivation of this plant has extended. One of the reasons for paying attention to this plant is its ability to adapt to harsh climatic conditions. It has a higher protein content than wheat, barley, corn and rice. On the other hand, plant seeds supply all the essential amino acids (including lysine, methionine and cysteine) needed by humans. The aim of this experiment was to investigate the effect of salinity stress on the amount of micronutrients and protein percentage in quinoa seeds.
Material and Methods: An experiment was planted as a split plot in a randomized complete block design with three replications on August 7, 2017. Experimental treatments included three superior genotypes (Sadough, Titicaca and NSRCQB). Genotype in sub-plot and irrigation water salinity at 3 levels of 2, 10 and 17 dS/m were located in the main plot. Finally, grain yield, saponin content (foam height), grain size and amount of micronutrients in grain and grain protein percentage were measured after saponification.
Results: The effect of salinity stress on 1000-grain weight, grain yield, grain size (1.7-2, 1.4-1.7 mm), foam height, iron, zinc, calcium content and protein yield were significant. Sadough cultivar had the highest 1000-seed weight and grain yield. Sadough and Titicaca cultivar had the highest percentage of large seeds and small seeds, respectively. With increasing salinity, seed yield of Titicaca cultivar decreased by 13% per unit increasing irrigation water salinity, while in Sadough and NSRCQB genotypes, there was no significant difference with non-saline level. With increasing salinity, the lowest foam height was related to NSRCQB genotype. The interaction effect of salinity stress and genotype on grain yield, foam height, percentage of iron, zinc, calcium, protein and protein yield was significant. With increasing salinity, iron content in Titicaca cultivar, zinc content in all three genotypes, nitrogen in Sadough and NSRCQB, calcium in Titicaca, protein percentage in Sadough and NSRCQB increased significantly compared to non-saline conditions. With increasing salinity, the highest increase slope among micronutrients was related to grain. Protein yield in Sadough and NSRCQB cultivars was not affected by salinity increase, while in Titicaca cultivar decreased by 13% per unit of irrigation water salinity.
Conclusion: With increasing salinity up to 10 dS/m, the seed yield of three quinoa genotypes was not affected and this plant is recommended for exploitation of saline water resources. Sadough cultivar was the best among the three genotypes. The percentage of micronutrients iron, calcium, zinc and grain protein increased under saline conditions and despite the decrease in grain yield, the protein yield per square meter was not affected. The rate of increase in micronutrients and decrease in yield with increasing salinity of irrigation water is affected by genotype. Since the quantity and quality of quinoa seeds are not affected by water salinity, it can be effective in improving food security in marginal areas.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Murphy, K.S. & Matanguihan, J., (2015). Quinoa: Improvement and sustainable production. John Wiley and Sons.
  2. Zurita-Silva, A., Fuentes, F., Zamora, P., Jacobsen, S.-E., & Schwember, A.R., (2014). Breeding quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa): potential and perspectives. Molecular Breeding, 34,1.13-30.
  3. Bazile, D., Jacobsen, S.-E., & Verniau, A., (2016). The global expansion of quinoa: trends and limits. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 622 p.
  4. Jacobsen, S.E., (2003). The worldwide potential for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). Food Reviews International, 19, 167-177.
  5. Choukr-Allah, R., Rao, N.K., Hirich, A., Shahid, M., Alshankiti, A., Toderich, K., Gill, S., & Butt, K.U.R., (2016). Quinoa for Marginal Environments: Toward Future Food and Nutritional Security in MENA and Central Asia Regions. Frontiers of Plant Science, ,7, 346, 1-11.
  6. Abugoch James, L.E., Chapter 1 Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa): Composition, Chemistry, Nutritional, and Functional Properties, in Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, L.T. Steve, Editor. (2009), Academic Press. p. 1-31.
  7. Tang, Y. & Tsao, R., (2017). Phytochemicals in quinoa and amaranth grains and their antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and potential health beneficial effects: a review. Molecular Nutrition and Food Research, (61), 1-16.
  8. Pathan, S., Eivazi, F., Valliyodan, B., Paul, K., Ndunguru, G., & Clark, K., (2019). Nutritional composition of the green leaves of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). Journal of Food Nutrition Research, (8), 55-65.
  9. Ruiz, B., Biondi, S., Oses, R., Acuña-Rodríguez, I.S., Antognoni, F., Martinez-Mosqueira, E.A., Coulibaly, A., Canahua-Murillo, A., Pinto, M., & Zurita-Silva, A., (2014). Quinoa biodiversity and sustainability for food security under climate change. A review. Agronomy Sustainable Development, (34), 349-359.
  10. Granado-Rodríguez, S., Aparicio, N., Matías, J., Pérez-Romero, L.F., Maestro, I., Gracés, I., Pedroche, J.J., Haros, C.M., Fernandez-Garcia, N., & Del Hierro, J.N., (2021). Studying the Impact of Different Field Environmental Conditions on Seed Quality of Quinoa: The Case of Three Different Years Changing Seed Nutritional Traits in Southern Europe. Frontier of Plant Science, (12), 649132.
  11. Maleki, P., Saadat, S., Bahrami, H.A., Rezaei, H., & Esmaeelnejad, L., (2019). Accumulation of ions in shoot and seed of quinoa (Chenopodium‎ quinoa Willd.) under salinity stress. Communication of Soil Science and Plant Analasis, (50),782-793.
  12. Koziol, M.J., (1991). Afrosimetric estimation of threshold saponin concentration for bitterness in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). Journal od Science and Food Agriculture, (54), 211-219.
  13. Wu, G., Peterson, A.J., Morris, C.F., & Murphy, K.M., (2016). Quinoa Seed Quality Response to Sodium Chloride and Sodium Sulfate Salinity. Front Plant Sci. 7.
  14. Nadeem, M., Tariq, M.N., Amjad, M., Sajjad, M., Akram, M., Imran, M., Shariati, M.A., Gondal, T.A., Kenijz, N., & Kulikov, D., (2020). Salinity-induced changes in the nutritional quality of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes. AGRIVITA, Journal of Agriculture Science. (42),1-12.
  15. Sabagh, A.E., Islam, M.S., Skalicky, M., Raza, M.A., Singh, K., Hossain, M.A., Hossain, A., Mahboob, W., Iqbal, M., & Ratnasekera, D., (2021). Salinity stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum ) in the changing climate: adaptation and management strategies. Frontier of Agronomy. (3), 661932.
  16. Farooq, S. & Azam, F., (2006). The use of cell membrane stability (CMS) technique to screen for salt tolerant wheat varieties. Journal of Plant physiology. (163), 629-637.
  17. Rasouli, F., Kiani-Pouya, A., Zhang, H., & Shabala, S., Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance in Quinoa, in Biology and Biotechnology of Quinoa.(2021), Springer. p. 221-242.
  18. Adolf, V.I., Jacobsen, S.E., & Shabala, S., (2012). Salt tolerance mechanisms in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa ). Environoment of Experimental Botany, (92), 43–54.
  19. Salehi, M., Dehghany, F., Soltani Gerdfaramarzi, V., & Besharat, N., (2021). Identify the effective traits for the selection of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) lines in spring cultivation under saline condition. Enviromental Stress in Crop Science, (14),1041-1054.[In persian].
  20. Kiani-Pouya, A., Rasouli, F., Bazihizina, N., Zhang, H., Hedrich, R., & Shabala, S., (2019). A large-scale screening of quinoa accessions reveals an important role of epidermal bladder cells and stomatal patterning in salinity tolerance. Enviromental and Experimental of Botany, (168), 103885.
  21. Cotton, P.A., Subar, A.F., Friday, J.E., & Cook, A., (2004). Dietary sources of nutrients among US adults, 1994 to 1996. Journal of American Diet Assocossian, (104), 921-930.
  22. Wu, G., Nutritional Properties of Quinoa, in Quinoa: Improvement and Sustainable Production. (2015), John Wiley and Sons, Inc. p. 193-210.
  23. Wu, G., (2015). Nutritional Properties of Quinoa. Quinoa: Improvement and Sustainable Production: p. 193-210.
  24. Karyotis, T., Iliadis, C., Noulas, C., & Mitsibonas, T., (2003). Preliminary research on seed production and nutrient content for certain quinoa varieties in a saline–sodic Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, (189), 402-408.
  25. Koyro, H.W., Lieth, H., & Eisa, S.S., (2008). Salt Tolerance of Chenopodium quinoa Willd., Grains of the Andes: Influence of Salinity on Biomass Production, Yield, Composition of Reserves in the Seeds, Water and Solute Relations. Mangroves and Halophytes: Restoration and Utilisation: p. 133-145.
  26. Katerji, N., van Hoorn, J.W., Hamdy, A., & Mastrorilli, M., (2003). Salinity effect on crop development and yield, analysis of salt tolerance according to several classification methods. Agricultural Water Management, (62), 37-66.
  27. Pulvento, C., Riccardi, M., Lavini, A., Iafelice, G., Marconi, E., & d’Andria, R., (2012). Yield and Quality Characteristics of Quinoa Grown in Open Field Under Different Saline and Non‐Saline Irrigation Regimes. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, (198), 254-263.