The effect of mycorrhizal fungi and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria on physiological traits and grain yield of red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in different irrigation regimes

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.Sc Graduated in Agronomy, Deptartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Deptartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran,

3 Agronomy Department, Agriculture Faculty, Yasouj university

4 Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran

Abstract

Abstract
Background and objectives. Beans are one of the most important food sources in many parts of the world due to their high protein content. According to geographical conditions, drought stress in Iran is one of the most important threats to agricultural products. Disruption of photosynthesis, destruction of cell structures, reduction of stomatal conductance and plant growth are among the effects of drought stress. Today, the use of biofertilizers based on soil microorganisms is one of the main goals of sustainable agriculture to improve plant condition. In addition to improving soil structure, biofertilizers improve plant growth and yield under stress conditions by increasing root morphology, increasing nutrient uptake and increasing antioxidant power. Due to the negative effect of drought stress on crop yield, an experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of biofertilizers on physiological characteristics and grain yield of red beans in different irrigation regimes.
Materials and methods. This experiment was performed as a split plot base on randomized complete block design with three replications in the research farm of Yasouj University in 2016. Experimental treatments include irrigation at three levels (normal irrigation, irrigation cut-off at the beginning of flowering to the beginning of podding and irrigation cut-off at the beginning of podding to maturity) and biofertilizer at four levels (control (no application) Biofertilizer (application of mycorrhiza fungus, phosphorus solubilizing bacteria and combined application of mycorrhizal fungus and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria). The red bean seed (phaseolus vulgaris) used in this experiment was a Derakhshan cultivar and the mycorrhizal fungus used was Funneliformis mosseae. Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria (Phosphate barvar2) base on Pseudomonas putida Strain P13 and Pantoea agglomerans Strain P5 were used as seed inoculation at planting time. Sampling was done randomly at the beginning of podding stage and in the middle of grain filling with respect to the marginal effect in each block in order to measure percentage of electrolyte leakage, leaf relative water content (RWC), content of photosynthetic pigments, soluble sugars, proline and malondialdehyde (MDA).
Results and Discussion. The results showed that different levels of irrigation were significant for traits such as RWC, electrolyte leakage percentage, MDA content, leaf proline content, leaf protein, soluble sugar concentration, total chlorophyll content and carotenoids. The effect of biofertilizer was significant on all traits except the RWC. It should be noted that the interaction of irrigation and biofertilizer was not significant on any of the studied physiological traits except for MDA.
Irrigation levels and application of biofertilizers also had a significant effect on grain yield, the combination of both biofertilizers was very effective on grain yield, especially in stress conditions. The grain yield was more than control in the case of irrigation cut-off in the flowering stage and in the case of irrigation cut-off in the stage of podding to maturity by 45 and 38%, respectively.
Conclusion. The results of this experiment showed that drought stress in the form of irrigation cut-off reduced the concentration of photosynthetic pigments, increased the levels of physiological degradation and thus reduced the grain yield of red beans. In conditions of drought stress application of mycorrhiza biofertilizers and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria, by reducing the damage caused by drought stress, prevented the reduction of bean yield. Also, the application of biofertilizers in normal conditions significantly increased the yield of red beans.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Weatherley, P.E. 1950. Studies in the water relations of the cotton plant. I. The field measurement of water deficits in leaves. New Phytol. 49: 81-97.
  2. Faraji Pain Rudposhti, M., Mobaser, H., Ghanbari Malidreh, A. and Nazari Nasi, H. 2012. The effect of drought stress on gas exchange and water relations of red bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris). Crop Prod Environ Stress. 4: 4. 13-26. (In persian).
  3. Madani, K., AghaKouchak, A. and Mirchi, A. 2016. Iran’s socio-economic drought: challenges of a water-bankrupt nation. Ir Studies. 49: 6. 997-1016.
  4. Halo, Boshra A., Rashid A. Al-Yahyai and Abdullah M. Al-Sadi. 2020. An endophytic Talaromyces omanensis enhances reproductive, physiological and anatomical characteristics of drought-stressed tomato. J Plant Physiol. 249: 5. 153163.
  5. Saraswathi, S.G. and Paliwal, K. 2011. Drought induced changes in growth, leaf gas exchange and biomass production in Albizia lebbeck and Cassia siamea J Environ Biol. 32: 2. 173-180.
  6. Kusvuran, S. and Dasgan, H. Y. 2017. Effects of drought stress on physiological and biochemical changes in Phaseolus vulgarisLegume Res. 40: 1. 55-62.
  7. Singh, P.K., Singh, M. and Tripathi, B. N. 2013. Glomalin: an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal soil protein. Protoplasma. 250: 3. 663-669.
  8. Srivastava, S., Chaudhry, V., Mishra, A., Chauhan, P.S., Rehman, A., Yadav, A., Tuteja, N. and Nautiyal, C.S. 2012. Gene expression profiling through microarray analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana colonized by Pseudomonas putida MTCC5279, a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium. Plant Signal Behav. 7: 2. 235-245.
  9. Bukhat, S., Imran, A., Javaid, S., Shahid, M., Majeed, A. and Naqqash, T. 2020. Communication of plants with microbial world: Exploring the regulatory networks for PGPR mediated defense signaling. Microbiol Res. 126486.
  10. Bhattacharyya, P.N. and Jha, D.K. 2012. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 28: 4. 1327-1350.
  11. Taktek, S., Trépanier, M., Servin, P.M., St-Arnaud, M., Piché, Y., Fortin, J.A. and Antoun, H. 2015. Trapping of phosphate solubilizing bacteria on hyphae of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis DAOM 197198. Soil Biol Biochem. 90: 11. 1-9.
  12. Vidya, P., Shintu, P.V. and Jayaram, K.M. 2014. Impact of phosphate solubilizing bacteria (Bacillus polymixa) on drought tolerance of green gram (Vigna radiate Wilczek). Ann Plant Sci. 5: 4. 1318-1323.
  13. Rapparini, F. and Peñuelas, J. 2014. Mycorrhizal fungi to alleviate drought stress on plant growth. P 21-42. In use of microbes for the alleviation of soil stresses, Volume 1. Springer. New York, NY.
  14. Gheiari Zardak, S., Movahedi Dehnavi, M., Salehi, A. and Gholamhoseini, M. 2017. Responses of field grown fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) to different mycorrhiza species under varying intensities of drought stress. J. Appl Res Medicin Aromat Plants. 5: 16-25.
  15. M. and Karami, V. 2015. Effects of different mycorhiza species on grain yield, nutrient uptake and oil content of sunflower under water stress. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 13: 1. 9-13.
  16. Nadeem, S.M., Ahmad, M., Zahir, Z.A., Javaid, A. and Ashraf, M. 2014. The role of mycorrhizae and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in improving crop productivity under stressful environments. Biotechnol Adv. 32: 2. 429-448.
  17. Calvo-Polanco, M., Sánchez-Romera, B., Aroca, R., Asins, M. J., Declerck, S., Dodd, I. C. and Ruiz-Lozano, J. M. 2016. Exploring the use of recombinant inbred lines in combination with beneficial microbial inoculants (AM fungus and PGPR) to improve drought stress tolerance in tomato. Environ Exp Bot. 131: 47-57.
  18. Rahmani, H.A., Räsänen, L.A., Afshari, M. and Lindström, K. 2011. Genetic diversity and symbiotic effectiveness of rhizobia isolated from root nodules of Phaseolus vulgaris grown in soils of Iran. Appl Soil Ecol. 48: 3. 287-293.
  19. Kamelmanesh, M.M., Dorri, H.R., Ghasemi, S., Bihamta, M.R. and Darvish F. 2008. Gene action for resistance to Bean common mosaic virus (BCMV) in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Ir J. Field Crops Res. 6: 2. 363-370. (In persian)
  20. Heath, R.L. and Packer, L. 1968. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 125: 1. 189-198.
  21. Paquine, R. and Lechasseur, P. 1979. Observations sur une methode dosage la libre dans les de plantes. Can J Bot. 57: 18. 1851-1854.
  22. Irigoyen, J.J., Emerich, D.W. and Sanchez-Diaz, M. 1992. Water stress induced change in concentrations of proline and total soluble sugars in modulated alfalfa (Medicago sativa) plant. Physiol Plant. 84: 1. 55-60
  23. Arnon, A.N. 1967. Method of extraction of chlorophyll in the plants. Agron J. 23: 112-121.
  24. Lichtenthaler, H.K. 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Meth Enzymol. 148: 350-382.
  25. Bradford, M.M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye-binding. Analyt Biochem. 72: 1-2. 248-252.
  26. Tyagi, J., Varma, A. and Namdeo Pudake, R. 2017. Evaluation of comparative effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza (Rhizophagus intradices) and endophyte (Piriformospora indica) association with finger millet (Eleusine coracana) under drought stress. Europ J. Soil Biol. 81: 1-10.
  27. Saeidi, M., moradi, F., Ahmadi, E., Sepehri, R., Najafian, G. and Shabani, A. 2011. The effect of terminal water stress on physiological cahracteristics and sink- source relations in two bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars. Ir J. Crop Sci. 12: 4. 392-408 . (In Persian)
  28. Zhang, S.H., Xu, X.F., Sun, Y.M., Zhang, J.L. and Li, C.Z. 2018. Influence of drought hardening on the resistance physiology of potato seedlings under drought stress. J Integr Agric. 17: 2. 336-347.
  29. Khan, H.U., Link, W., Hocking, T. and Stoddard, F. 2007. Evaluation of physiological traits for improving drought tolerance in faba bean (Vicia faba). Plant Soil. 292: 1-2. 205-217.
  30. Mousavifar, E., Behdani, M.A., Jami Al-Ahmadi, M. and Hosseini Bejd, M.S. 2010. Effect of low irrigation on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of grain production in spring safflower cultivars. Ir Agric Res. 8: 2. 375-383. (In Persian)
  31. Gontia‐Mishra, I., Sapre, S., Sharma, A. and Tiwari, S. 2016. Amelioration of drought tolerance in wheat by the interaction of plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria. Plant Biol. 18: 6. 992-1000.
  32. Chakrabarty, D., Chatterjee, J. and Datta, S.K. 2007. Oxidative stress and antioxidant activity as the basis of senescence in chrysanthemum florets. Plant Growth Regul. 53:2. 107-115.
  33. Keshavarz, H. and Khodabin, G. 2019. The role of uniconazole in improving physiological and biochemical attributes of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) subjected to drought stress. J Crop Sci Biotechnol. 22: 2. 161-168.
  34. Huang, Y.M., Zou, Y.N. and Wu, Q.S. 2017. Alleviation of drought stress by mycorrhizas is related to increased root H2O2 efflux in trifoliate orange. Sci Rep. 7: 42335
  35. Alipour, H., Nikbakht, A., Etemadi, N., Rejali, F. and Soleimani, M. 2020. Biochemical response and interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria during establishment and stimulating growth of Arizona cypress (Cupressus arizonica) under drought stress. Sci. Hortic. 261: 108923.
  36. Kaczmarek, M., Fedorowicz-Strońska, O., Głowacka, K., Waśkiewicz, A. and Sadowski, J. 2017. CaCl2treatment improves drought stress tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Acta Physiol Plant. 39: 41. 3-11.
  37. Darkwa, K., Ambachew, D., Mohammed, H., Asfaw, A. and Blair, M. W. 2016. Evaluation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes for drought stress adaptation in Ethiopia. Crop J. 4: 5. 367-376.
  38. Yadavi, A.R., Saeidi Aboueshaghi, R., Movahhedi Dehnavi, M. and Balouchi, H.R. 2014. Effect of micronutrients foliar application on grain qualitative characteristics and some physiological traits of bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris) under drought stress. Ind J Fund Appl Life Sci. 4: 4. 2231-6345.
  39. Sohrabi, Y., Heidari, G., Weisany, W., Golezani, K.G. and Mohammadi, K. 2012. Changes of antioxidative enzymes, lipid peroxidation and chlorophyll content in chickpea types colonized by different Glomus species under drought stress. Symbiosis. 56: 1. 5-18.
  40. Ansari, M.F., Tipre, D.R. and Dave, S.R. 2015. Efficiency evaluation of commercial liquid biofertilizers for growth of Cicer aeritinum (chickpea) in pot and field study. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol.4: 1. 17-24.
  41. Hristozkova, M., Geneva, M., Stancheva, I., Boychinova, M. and Djonova, E. 2016. Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in attenuation of heavy metal impact on Calendula officinalisAppl Soil Ecol. 101: 57-63.
  42. Zadehbagheri, M., Kamelmanesh, M.M., Javanmardi, Sh. and Sharafzadeh, Sh. 2012. Effect of drought stress on yield and yield components, relative leaf water content, proline and potassium ion accumulation in different white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotype. Afr J Agric Res. 42: 5661-5670.
  43. Rejeb, K.B., Abdelly, C. and Savouré, A. 2014. How reactive oxygen species and proline face stress together. Plant Physiol Biochem. 80: 278-284.
  44. Ren, C.G., Kong, C.C., Yan, K. and Xie, Z.H. 2019. Transcriptome analysis reveals the impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis on Sesbania cannabina expose to high salinity. Sci Rep. 9: 1. 1-9.
  45. R. and Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. 2004. Arbuscular mycorrhizal influence on leaf water potential, solute accumulation, and oxidative stress in soybean plants subjected to drought stress. J Exp Bot. 55: 403. 1743-1750.
  46. Petropoulos, S.A., Fernandes, A., Plexida, S., Chrysargyris, A., Tzortzakis, N., Barreira, J. and Ferreira, I.C. 2020. Biostimulants application alleviates water stress effects on yield and chemical composition of greenhouse green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Agron. 10: 181. 1-26.
  47. Yooyongwech, S., Samphumphuang, T., Tisarum, R., Theerawitaya, C. and Cha-Um, S. 2017. Water-deficit tolerance in sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] by foliar application of paclobutrazol: role of soluble sugar and free proline. Front Plant Sci. 8: 1400.
  48. Golldack, D., Li, C., Mohan, H. and Probst, N. 2014. Tolerance to drought and salt stress in plants: unraveling the signaling networks. Front Plant Sci. 5: 151
  49. Yazdanpanah, S., Baghizadeh, A. and Abbassi, F. 2011. The interaction between drought stress and salicylic and ascorbic acids on some biochemical characteristics of Satureja hortensis. Afr J Agric Res. 6: 4. 798-807.
  50. Figueiredo, M.V., Burity, H.A., Martinez, C.R. and Chanway, C.P. 2008. Alleviation of drought stress in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) by co-inoculation with Paenibacillus polymyxa and Rhizobium tropici. Appl Soil Ecol. 40: 1. 182-188.
  51. Abbaspour, H., Saeidi-Sar, S., Afshari, H. and Abdel-Wahhab, M. A. 2012. Tolerance of mycorriza infected pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) seedling to drought stress under glasshouse conditions. J. Plant Physiol. 169: 7. 704-709.
  52. Ganjeh, S.G. and Salehi, A. 2015. Effects of different levels of vermicompost and biofertilizers on essential oil content and uptake of some elements in cumin (Cuminum cyminum). Ir J Med Aromat Plants. 31: 5. 822-829.
  53. Overvoorde, P., Fukaki, H. and Beeckman, T. 2010. Auxin control of root development. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2: 6. a001537
  54. Lopes, M.S., Araus, J.L., Van Heerden, P.D. and Foyer, C.H. 2011. Enhancing drought tolerance in C4 J Exp Bot. 62: 9. 3135-3153.