Identification of Lolium rigidum gaud. biotypes resistant to the clodinafop propargyl herbicide in wheat fields of Golestan province

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD student of Agronomy, Department of Agronomy, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran.

2 Agronomy department, Plant Production faculty, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Plant Production, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran,

4 Professor, Iranian Plant Research Institute / Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization.Iran.

5 Researcher, Center for Scientific and Technological Research of Extremadura (CICYTEX), Badajoz, Spain.

6 Professor ,Department of Agricultural Chemistry University of Córdoba, Spain.

Abstract

Background and Objectives
Detection of resistance to an herbicide in a putatively resistant accession requires a series of experiments which are capable of illustrating the response of the accession to various herbicide doses. Whole plant bioassay in pots usually takes approx. 2 months to obtain the results, thus, rapid tests were developed to accelerate the process. Although determination of discriminating concentration as well as conduction of rapid test for some ACCase inhibitors has been performed by various researchers, no reports are available in this regard for in clodinafop propargyl herbicide in rigid ryegrass from wheat field of Golestan province. Thus, the following study was conducted with the objective of rapid detection of resistance to the mentioned herbicide in this weed using the rapid test.
Materials and Methods
The experiments were conducted using the seeds of 30 putatively resistant rigid ryegrass accessions and a susceptible biotype gathered from wheat field of Golestan province in 2019. Rapid test in petri dishes was conducted as a completely randomized design with three replications, with each petri dish as one replicate. To determine the discriminating concentration, various concentrations of clodinafop propargyl was applied on the susceptible accession and then, all putative accessions were screened using this concentrations. The biotypes of the studied weed were exposed to various doses of the herbicide in the petri dish bioassay to determine the resistance factor. Also, another experiment based on a completely randomized design with three replications was conducted for screening of putative accessions in the greenhouse. Accessions which maintained their survival and dry weight respectively 50 and 80 percent compared to the unsprayed control were selected. A whole plant dose-response bioassay was also done separately for each biotype. Checking the distribution map of resistant biotypes indicated that these biotypes were not uniform in the wheat fields of Golestan province. During sampling, geographical coordinates of infected areas were recorded using GPS Map60 device and weed distribution map was prepared using ArcGIS software.
Results
Discriminating concentration of clodinafop propargyl for rigid ryegrass was obtained 0.0196 mg ai. L-1. According to the results, 25 out of 30 accessions were detected as resistant and underwent the concentration- response assay in petri dishes. Resistant factors of the biotypes in the rapid test ranged from 38.75 to 1756.20. According to the results of the greenhouse, 25 accessions were detected as resistant with resistance factors of 11.58 to 24.05. There was a positive and significant correlation between the results obtained from the rapid test with the greenhouse assay (%93). Investigation of distribution map of resistant biotypes indicated non-even distribution of these biotypes across wheat fields of Golestan province, with resistant and susceptible biotypes often observed in the west and east of the province, respectively.
Conclusion
Putative rigid ryegrass accessions collected from the region may be screened using 0.0196 mg ai. L-1 concentration and resistant biotypes may be detected more rapidly compared to greenhouse assays. Also, the results of the rapid test are in accordance with those of the whole plant assay in pots. Due to the swift development phenomenon of herbicide resistance issue, rapid detection of resistance is essential. Thus, using methods such as rapid test may be very feasible.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Ghorbani, R., MirAlavi, S.V. and Sabet Teimouri, M. 2012. Effect of planting date and crop density of autumn wheat (Triticum aestivum) on density and biomass of weeds. Agroecology. 4: 4. 294-306. (In Persian)
  2. Rosario, J.M., Cruz-Hipolito, H., Smeda, R.J. and De Prado, R. 2011. White mustard (Sinapis alba) resistanceto ALS-inhibiting herbicides and alternative herbicides for control in Spain. Eur J. Agron. 35: 2. 57-62.
  3. Singh, S., Kirkwood, R.C. and Marshall, G. 1999. Biology and control of Phalaris minor (little seed cana rygrass) in wheat (Review Article). Crop Protect. 18: 1. 1-16.
  4. Suzukawa, A.K., Bobadilla, L.K., Mallory-Smith, C. and Brunharo, C.A. 2020. Non-target-site resistance in Lolium Globally: a review. Front Plant Sci. 11: 2. 21-37.‏
  5. Zand, E., Bena Kashani, F., Baghestani, M.A., Meknali, A., Minbashi, M., Soufizadeh, S. and Deihimfard, R. 2007. Investigating the distribiotion of clodinafop propargyl resistant Wild oat (Avena ludoviciana) populationsin south western Iran. Environ Sci. 4: 3. 85-92. (In Persian)
  6. Forouzesh, A., Zand, E., Soufizadeh, S. and Samadi Foroushani, S. 2015. Classification of herbicides according to chemical family for weed resistance management strategies–an update. Weed Res. 55:4. 334-358.‏
  7. Collavo, A., Panozzo, S., Lucchesi, G., Scarabel, L. and Sattin, M. 2011. Characterisation and management of Phalaris paradoxa resistant to ACCaseinhibitors. Crop Protect. 30: 3. 293-299.
  8. Delye, C., Jasieniuk, M. and Valerie, C.L. 2013. Deciphering the evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds. Trend Genet. 29: 11. 649-658.
  9. Heap, I. 2021. The international survey of Herbicide resistant weeds. http:// www. Weed science .com (3 December 2021(.
  10. Gherekhloo, J., Oveisi, M., Zand, E. and De Prado, R. 2016. A review of herbicide resistance in Iran. Weed Sci. 64: 4. 551-561.
  11. Topuz, M., Nemli, Y., Fatima, T. and Mattoo, A.K. 2015. Seed dormancy is modulated in recently evolved chlorsulfuron-resistant Turkish biotypes of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis). Front Chem. 3: 2. 46-52.
  12. Zand, E., Baghestani, M.A., Bena Kashani, F. and Dastaran, F. 2010. Investigating efficiency of some herbicides in control of resistant and susceptible wild oat (Avena ludoviciana Durieu) biotypes to acetyl -CoA carboxylase. J. Plant Protect. 24: 3. 242-251. (In Persian)
  13. Gherekhloo, J., Rashed Mohassel, M.H., Nassiri Mahalati, M., Zand, , Ghanbari, A., Osuna, M.D. and De Prado., R.  2008. Seed bioassay and ACCase enzyme assay to study the resistance of Phalaris minor to aryloxyphenoxypropionate (APP) inhibitors. Environ. 6: 1. 43-52. (In Persian)
  14. Aghajani, Z., Zand. E., Baghestani, M.A. and Mirhadi, M.J. 2009. Resistance of wild oat (Avena ludoviciana annual bastardcabbage (Rapistrum rugosum) resistance to tribenuron-methyl in Agh Ghala. J. Plant Protect. 29: 2.199-205.(In Persian)
  15. Elahifard, E., Rashed Mohassel, M.H., Zand, E. and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2008. The investigation of the Dur accessions to ACCase inhibitor herbicides in Gonbad-E Kavus wheat fields and mapping their distribution. Plant Prod. 41: 2. 103-116 .(In Persian)
  16. Gherekhloo, J., Rashed Mohassel, M.H., Nassiri Mahalati, M.,  Zand, E.,  Ghanbari, A.,  Osuna, M.D. and DePrado, R. 2011. Confirmed resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides in Phalaris minor populations in Iran. Weed Biol and manage. 11: 1. 29-37.
  17. Najari Kalantari, N. 2013. Identification of resistant weeds to ACCase and ALS inhibitors wheat of Aq Qala and preparing their distribution map. MSc thesis, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources.
  18. Beckie, H.J., Heap, I.M., Smeda, R.J. and Hall, L. 2000. Screening for herbicide resistance in weeds (Review.). Weed Technol. 14: 2. 428-445.
  19. Burgos, N.R. 2015. Whole-plant and seed bioassays for resistance confirmation. Weed Sci. 63: 1. 152-165.
  20. Ritz, C. and Streibig, J.C. 2005. Bioassay analysis using R.J. Stat Soft.12: 1. 1-22.
  21. Sasanfar, H., Zand, E., Baghestani, M.A., Mirhadi, M.J. and Mesgaran, M.B. 2017. Cross-resistance patterns ofwinter wild oat (Avena ludoviciana) populations to ACCase inhibitor herbicides. Phytoparasitica. 45: 3. 419-428. (In Persian)
  22. Yang, C.H. Dong, L.Y., Li, J. and Moss, S.R. 2007. Identification of Japanese foxtail (Alopecurus japonicus) resistant to haloxyfop using three different assay techniques. Weed Sci. 55: 6. 537-540.
  23. Wrzesinska, B., Kierzek, R. and Obrepalska-steplowska, A. 2016. Evaluation of six commonly used reference genes for gene expression studies in herbicide resistant Avena fatua Weed Res. 56: 4. 1. 284-292.
  24. Kalami, R. 2014. Identification of resistant weeds to ACCasa and ALS inhibitors herbicides in wheat fields of Kordkuy. MSc thesis, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources.
  25. Derakhshan, A., Najari Kalantari N., Gherekhloo, J. and Kamkar B. 2015. Wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) and annual bastardcabbage (Rapistrum rugosum) resistance to tribenuron-methyl in Agh Ghala. J. Plant Protect. 29: 2. 199-205. (In Persian)
  26. Devine, M.D. 1997. Mechanism of resistance to acetyl- CoA Carboxylase inhibitors. Pest Sci. 51: 3. 259-264.
  27. Scursoni, J.A., Gigon, R., Martin, A.N., Vigna, M., Leguizamon, E.S., Istilart, C. and Lopez, R. 2014. Changesin weed communities of spring wheat crops of Buenos Aires province of Argentina. Weed Sci. 62: 1. 51-62.
Journal of Crop Production
Volume 15, Issue 4
January 2023
Pages 1-18

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics