Effects of water stress conditions on Yield, Harvest Index, and Sterility in Wheat Genotypes (Triticum aestivum).

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Biotechnology and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.

2 Department of Biotechnology and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekordia, Iran.

3 Department of Biotechnology and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

Abstract

Abstract
Background and objectives: Plants are exposed to drought stress in field conditions. The occurrence of these droughts has imposed a very harmful effect on the agricultural and economic sectors of the country. Response of plants to water stress depends on the type, intensity, and duration of stress, plant species and the stage of stress occurrence. Investigate has shown that water stress before the tillering stage reduces the number of fertile tillers, stress at the flower inoculation stage reduces the weight and number of seeds and causes cluster sterility, and moisture stress during the grain filling period produces wrinkled seeds. The study aimed was to investigate the effect of different water stress conditions on yield, harvest index and sterility at the end of the cluster in wheat genotypes.
Materials and methods: To analyze the effects of three different humidity regimes on yield, yield component and apical sterility of wheat, three different experiments were carried out in randomized completey block designs with three replications. The three different humidity regimes included normal conditions (without stress), water-stress at the meiosis stage and continuous water stress (30% of Field Capacity). Ten different wheat genotypes including Alvand, Roshan, Back cross Roshan, Ehdaei 81، Ehdaei 82، Ehdaei 79, Oxley، ChineseSpring، DN11 and Line 604 were evaluated in this experiment.
Results: Results indicated that the responses of the genotypes to the water-stress condition were different. Analysis of variance showed highly significant variation for most of the characters under study. Both stress conditions, either meiosis stress or continuous stress, reduced all the characters of genotypes compared with non-stress conditions. Among the genotypes under study, Oxley indicated the highest amount of yield in both the meiosis stage and continuous water-stress conditions. On the other side, Line 604 showed the highest number of seeds and lowest sterile florets at both meiosis stage and continuous water-stress conditions. The highest rate of apical sterility in water-stress at meiosis stage and 30% of field capacity in Alvand genotype was observed.
Conclusion: Results showed that drought stress in all types of stress reduced the evaluated traits. Due to stress the number of sterile florets increased and yield decreased. Stress in the meiotic stage had a significant effect on increasing the apical sterility and total Sterility, and stress of 30% of field capacity was effective in reducing grain yield and harvest index and increasing the number of the sterile claw in wheat genotypes.
Keywords: Wheat, Different Irrigation Regimes, Yield, Yield Components, Sterility.

Keywords


  1.  Abdoli, M. and Saeidi, M. 2013. Effect of Drought Stress during Grain Filling on Yield and Its Components, Gas Exchange Variables, and Some Physiological Traits of Wheat Cultivars. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 17:4.885-898. (In Persian)

    1. Ahmadi-Lahijani, M. and Emam, Y. 2013. Response of Wheat genotypes to terminal drought stress using physiological indices. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 3:9. 163-176. (In Persian)
    2. Arzani, A., and Ashraf, M. 2017. Cultivated ancient wheats (Triticum spp.): A potential source of health- beneficial food products. Comper. Rev. Food. Sci. F. 16: 3. 477-488.
    3. Amiri, R. Bahraminejad, S. and Sasani, S. 2013. Evaluation of genetic diversity of bread wheat genotypes based on physiological traits in nonstress and terminal drought stress conditions. Cereal Res. 2:4. 289-305. (In Persian)
    4. Behdad, M. Paknejad, F. Vazan, S. Ardakani, M.R. and Nasri, M. 2009. Effect of Drought Stress on Yield and Grain Yield Components in Different Stages of Wheat Cultivation Growth. ESCS.1:2. 143-157. (In Persian)
    5. Day, A.D., and Intalap, S. 1970. Some Effects of soil moisture on the growth of wheat. J. 62:27-29.
    6. Debaeke, P., and Abdellah, A. 2004. Adaptation of crop management to water-limited environments. EJA. 21: 4. 433-446.
    7. Dolferus, R., and Richards, R.A. 2011. Abiotic stress and control of grain number in cereals. Plant Sci. 181: 4. 331-341.
    8. Dolferus, R., Powell, N. JI X., Ravash, R., Edlington, J., Oliver, S., Van Dongen, J., and Shiran, B. 2013. The Physiology of Reproductive-Stage Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Cereals. Molecular Stress Physiology of Plants. Springer India. 193-216.
    9. Fani, A. 2006. Effect of Water-Stress on Sterility in Genotypes of Wheat and its Relationship with Yield. Master Thesis. Shahrekord University. (In Persian)
    10. Farshadfar, E. and Amiri, R. 2016. Assessment of drought resistance in different bread wheat lines using agro-physiological traits and integrated selection index. ESCS. 11:1. 79-91. (In Persian)
    11. Fowler, D.B. 2002. Growth stages of wheat. Agron. Sust. Ain. Dev. Springer. 17: 87-92.
    12. Jamali, K.D., Arain, M.A., and Javad, M.A. 2003. Breeding of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) for semi- dwarf character and high yield. Wheat Information Service Japan. 96: 11-14.
    13. Jazaeri Nushabadi, M.R. and Rezaei, A.M. 2007. Evaluation of relation between parameters in oat cultivars in water stress and non stress conditions. Agric. 11: 265-278. (In Persian)
    14. Ji, X., Shiran, B., Wan, J., Lewis, DC., Jenkins, C.L.D., Condon, AG., Richards, R.A., and Dolferus, R. 2010. Importance of preanthesis anther sink strength for maintenance of grain number during reproductive stage water stress in wheat. Plant Cell Environ. 33:926-942.
    15. Kafi, M. Borzooei, A. Salehi, M. Kamandi, A. Masumi, A. and Nabati, J. 2009. Physiology of Environmental Stresses in Plants. Jahad of University of Mashhad University Press. 502 p. (In Persian)
    16. Lonbani, M., and Arzani, A. 2011. Morpho-physiological traits associated with terminal droughtstress tolerance in triticale and wheat. Res. 9:1. 315–329.
    17. Majidi Fakhr, F. Paknejad, F. Ilkayi, M. and Khanpour, M. 2011. Investigation of Deformation due to Low Water Stress of Autumn Wheat Cultivars using Drought Resistance Indicators in Karaj Region. J. Agric. Res. 3: 257-267. (In Persian)
    18. Mitra, J. 2001. Genetics and genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants. Curr. Sci.80: 758-763.
    19. Mohammady, Sh. Sadatinejad, S.J. and Shiran, B.B. 2006. Which one is responsible for apical sterility in wheat under water–stress conditions, ovule or pollen. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 15:9. 2808-2811.
    20. Nouri-Ganbalani, A. Nouri-Ganbalani, G. and Hassan-Panah, D. 2009. Effects of drought stress condition on the yield and yield components of advanced wheat genotypes in Ardabil. Iranian, Food Agric. Environ. 7: 228-234. (In Persian)
    21. Raesi, A. 2008. Chromosomal Location of Genes Controlling Water–Stress Induced Apical Sterility of Spike using Candidate Chromosomal Substitution Lines in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Master Thesis. Shahrekord University. (In Persian)
    22. Sangtarash, M.H. 2010. Responses of Different Wheat Genotypes to Drought Stress Applied at Different Growth Stages. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 13:3. 114-119.
    23. Siani, H.S., and Aspinall, D. 1981. Effects of water deficit on sporogensis in wheat. Ann. Bot. 43: 623-633.
    24. Soleymani, A. 2016. Effect of drought stress on yield and yield components of wheat by ET-HS model. ESCS. 9: 205-215.
    25. Tadesse, W., Solh, M., Braun, H.J., Oweis, T., and Baum, M. 2016. Approaches and Strategies for Sustainable Wheat Production. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas. Beirut, Lebanon. 92:9127-9047.

    Tricker, P., Elltabti, A., Schmidt, J., and Feary, D. 2018. The physiological and