Evaluation of adaptation of different varieties of Canola(Brassica napus L.) under the climatic conditions of Shirvan

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

دانشگاه گنبد کاووس

Abstract

Introduction
Canola (Brassica napus L.) is one of the most important oil crops in the world. It has placed in third rank after Soybean and Palm and it has had the fastest of growth rate among oil seed in recent decades too. Canola yield was 1592 and 1567 kg.ha-1 in Iran and the world in 2003 respectively. It has increased 2125 and 2043 kg.ha-1 in Iran and the world in 2014 respectively. Crop physiologist should investigate the important physiological parameters which in the past have increased yield and can help to increase the quality and quantity of crop yield in the future. Therefore, the current study was carried out to evaluate the physiological traits associated with canola (Brassica napus L.) genotypes yield improvement.
Materials and Methods
Experiment was conducted as randomized complete block design with four replications at Higher Education Complex of Shirvan during growing seasons 2014-2015 and 2015-2016. Treatments were included 20 varieties and lines of rapeseed. The record of phonological stages was done based on Sylvester-Bradley (1984)’s method. Before the plants showed elongation, aboveground biomass and LAI were measured from destructive sampling and it has been continuing at intervals of 6 to 10 d until physiological maturity. Yield and components were measured at the end of the growing season. In order to investigation of growth indices, we have divided the varieties to three group based on cluster analysis and is select a variety as group representative. The groups are include high yield (Bilbao), medium yield (Karaje 3) and low yield (Sarigol).
Results and Discussion
Results indicated that there was significant differences among studied varieties in terms of phonological traits. So that Sarigol, Talatee, Shirali, Zafar and Zarfam were achieved earlier than others to physiological maturity. Positive and significant correlation of flowering duration with yield (r=0.66**) and the number of pod.plant-1 (r=0.88**) has showed its importance in determination of yield. Also, the most important of stage at making yield affected by environmental conditions such as temperature, radiation and rainfall. LAI for Bilbao was higher than Sarigol and Karaje 3. Also, Sarigol was achieved maximum LAI earlier than two other varieties. There was strong correlation between yield and maximum dry matter accumulation (r=0.81**). The synchronization of maximum LAI with more solar radiation was much more important to achieve maximum yield. In the first year of experiment CGR and RGR were higher than second. There were more solar radiation in first year that it was increased growth indices, also, harvest index. The number of pod.plant-1, seed.pod-1, harvest index, biological yield and seed yield were higher in the first year of experiment. The part of difference of yield between two years associated with reduced growth indices and another reason was decreased harvest index. Generally, biological yield, harvest index, days to achieve maximum leaf area index and number of pods per plant displayed 99% of the total yield- related changes.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Ahmadi, J., Khatibi, M., Amirshekari, H., and Amini Dehagi, M. 2011. Evaluation of the effective morpho-physiological indices on the yield of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using multivariate statistical methods. Agron. J. 4: 55-66. (In Persian).
  2. Alavipanah, K. 2006. Thermal remote sensing and its application in earth sciences. Tehran University Press. 524p. (In Persian).
  3. Al-Gaadi, K.A., Hassaballa, A.A., Tola, E., Kayad, A.G., Madugundu, R., Alblewi, B., and Assiri, F. 2016. Prediction of potato crop yield using precision agriculture techniques. PLoS One. 11: 9. 1-16.
  4. Aparicio, N., Villegas, D., Casadesus, J., Araus, J.L., and Royo, C. 2000. Spectral vegetation indices as nondestructive tools for determining durum wheat yield. Agro. J. 92: 1. 83-91.
  5. Asrar, G., Fuchs, M., Kanemasu, E., and Hatfield, J. 1984. Estimating absorbed photosynthetic radiation and leaf area index from spectral reflectance in wheat. Agron. J. 76: 300-306.
  6. Bannari, A., Morin, D., Bonn, F., and Huete, A. 1995. A review of vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Reviews. 13: 95- 120.
  7. Baret, F., and Guyot, G. 1991. Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment. Remote Sens. Environ. 35: 161-173.
  8. Bausch, W.C., Halvorson, A.D., and Cipra, J. 2008. Quick bird satellite and ground-based multispectral data correlations with agronomic parameters of irrigated maize grown in small plots. Biosyst Eng. IOI. 306-315.
  9. Campbell, J.B. 2011. Introduction to Remote Sensing. Guilford Press. 667p.
  10. Gitelson, A.A. 1996. Remote estimation of leaf area index and green leaf biomass in maize canopies. J. Plant Physiol. 161: 165-173.
  11. Goel, N.S., and Qin, W. 1994. Influences of canopy architecture on relationships between various vegetation indices and LAI and FPAR: a computer simulation. Remote Sens. Reviews, 10: 309- 347.
  12. Hoffmann, C., and Blomberg, M. 2004. Estimation of leaf area index of Beta vulgaris L. based on optical remote sensing data. J. Agro. Crop Sci. 190: 197-204.
  13. Huete, A.R. 1988. A soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sens. Environ. 25: 295-309.
  14. Huete, A.R., Liu, H., Batchily, K., and Leeuwen, W. 1997. A comparison of vegetation indices over a global set of TM images for EOS-MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 59: 3. 440-451.
  15. Jiang, Z., Huete, A.R., Chen, J., Chen, Y., Li, J., Yan, G., and Zhang, X. 2006. Analysis of NDVI and scaled difference vegetation index retrievals of vegetation fraction. Remote Sens. Environ. 101: 366-378.
  16. Jiang, Z., Huete, A.R., Didan, K., and Miura, T. 2008. Development of a two-band enhanced vegetation index without a blue band. Remote Sens. Environ.112: 3833-3845.
  17. Jimen´ez-Mu˜noz, J.C., Sobrino, J.A., Plaza, A., Guanter, L., Moreno, J., and Martinez, P. 2009. Comparison between fractional vegetation cover retrievals from vegetation indices and mixture analysis: case study of PROBA/CHRIS data over an Agricultural area. Sensors. 9: 768-793.
  18. Jordan, C.F. 1969. Derivation of leaf area index from quality of light on forest floor. Ecol. J. 50: 663-666.
  19. Kamali, G.A., Momenzadeh, H., and Vazifeh Doust, M. 2011. Study of wheat yield production over Esfahan province during periods of dry and wet years using MODIS satellite data. J. Agro. 2: 181-190. (In Persian).
  20. Li-Hong, X., Wei-Xing, C., and Lin-Zhang, L. 2007. Predicting grain yield and protein content in winter wheat at different supply levels using canopy reflectance spectra. Published by Elsevier Limited Science Press. 17: 5. 646-653.
  21. Lopresti, M.F., Di Bella, C.M., and Degioanni, A.J. 2015. Relationship between MODIS-NDVI data and wheat yield: A case study in Northern Buenos Aires province, Argentina. Inform. Process. Agri. 2: 73-84.         
  22. Mohammadi Ahmad Mahmoudi, E., Kamkar, B., and Abdi, O. 2015. Comparison land- statistic methods and the use of remote sensing data to predict wheat yield in some stage of growth (Case study: field lands of Golestan province). J. Crop Prod. 8: 2. 51-76. (In Persian).
  23. Mosleh Ghahfarokhi, Z. 2016. Soil digital mapping, land suitability and optimization cultivation model for major products plains of Shahrekord. PhD thesis pedology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Shahrekord, Iran. (In Persian)
  24. Pinter, P., Jackson, R., Idso, S., and Reginato, R. 1981. Multidate spectral reflectance as predictors of yield in water stressed wheat and barley. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2: 1. 43-48.  
  25. Raun, W.R., Solie, J.B., Stone, M.L., Lukina, E.V., Thomason, W.E., and Schepers, J.S. 2001. In season prediction of potential grain yield in winter wheat using canopy reflectance. Agron. J. 93: 131-138.
  26. Rondeaux, G., Steven, M. and Baret, F. 1996. Optimization of soil- adjusted vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 55: 98-107.
  27. Roujean, J.L., and Breon, F.M. 1995. Estimating PAR absorbed by vegetation from bidirectional reflectance measurements. Remote Sens. Environ. 51: 375-384.
  28. Rouse, J.W. 1974. Monitoring the vernal advancement of retrogration of natural vegetation. NASA/GSFS Type III, Final Report, Greenbelt, MD.
  29. Sanaeinejad, H., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Zare, H., Salehnia, N., and Ghaemi, M. 2014. Wheat yield estimation using landsat images and field observation: A case study in Mashhad. J. Plant Prod. 20: 4. 45-63. (In Persian).
  30. Serrano, L., Filella, I., and Penuelas, J. 2000. Remote sensing of biomass and yield of winter wheat under different nitrogen supplies. Crop Sci. 40: 3. 723-731.  
  31. Shanahan, J.F., Schepers, J.S., Francis, D.D., Varvel, G.E., Wilhelm, W.W., Tringe, J.M., Schlemmer, M.R., and Major, D.J. 2001. Use of remote-sensing imagery to estimate corn grain yield. Agron. J. 93: 583-589.
  32. Siyal, A.A., Dempewolf, J., and Becker-Reshef, I. 2015. Rice yield estimation using Landsat ETM+ Data. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 9: 1-16.
  33. Solaimani, K., Shokrian, F., Tamartash, R., and Banihashemi, M. 2011. Landsat ETM+ based assessment of vegetation indices in highland environment. J. Adv. Res. Dev. 2: 1. 5-13.
  34. Tucker, C.J., Holben, B.N., Elgin, Jr, J. H., and McMurtrey, J.E. 1981. Remote sensing of total dry -matter accumulation in winter wheat. Remote Sens. Environ. 11: 171-189.
  35. Tucker, C.J. 1979. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens. Environ. 8: 127-150.
  36. Tucker, C.J., Holben, B.N., Elgin Jr, J.H., and McMurtrey III, J.E. 1980. Relationship of spectral data to grain yield variation. Photogramm. Photogramm. Eng. Rem S. 46: 657-666.
  37. Webster, R. and Oliver, M.A. 1990. Statistical methods in soil and land resource survey. Spatial Information Systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  38. Wiegand, C.L., Richardson, A.J., Escobar, D.E. and Gerbermann, A.H. 1991. Vegetation indices in crop assessments. Remote Sens. Environ. 35: 105-119.
  39. Zahirnia, A.R. and Matinfar, H.R. 2016. Evaluate the yield of irrigated wheat fields on the basis of data obtained from Landsat 8 in the southwestern province of Khuzestan. First National Conference on Remote Sensing and GIS in the earth sciences. Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Research Center-in. College of Agriculture, Shiraz University. (In Persian).
  40. Zanter, K. 2015. Landsat8 (L8) data users handbook. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological
  41. Zeinvand, M., Matinfar, H.R. and Zahirnia, A.R. 2016. Alfalfa yield estimation based on data obtained from Landsat 8, in plain Jaydar Poldokhtar of Lorestan province. First National Conference on Remote Sensing and GIS in the earth sciences. Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Research Center-in. College of Agriculture, Shiraz University. (In Persian).