Effect of crop density and sowing date on the growth indices and weed control of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Khuzestan, Iran

2 Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Khuzestan, Iran.

Abstract

Background and objectives:
One of the important requirements in agronomic planning is to determine the best and most suitable sowing date in order to achieve high quality and desirable quality of yield. Therefore, this experiment was conducted in order to determine the most suitable planting date and plant density in terms of weed control in dryland chickpea in Koohdasht, Lorestan, Iran.

Materials and Methods:
The experiment was conducted as split plot in randomized complete block design with four replications with three planting dates (20 January, 8 February and 28 February) as main plot and four densities (16, 32, 48 and 64 plant m-2) as sub plot in 2016-2017 in the climate conditions of Kohdasht. Sampling from chickpea and weeds was done four weeks after planting until the end of the growing season with a time interval of 7-10 days. In order to describe the changes in total dry matter (wmax) and leaf area index (LAI) against time after planting (t), the truncated expolinear and beta model was used, respectively.

Results:
The results showed that the dry matter changes and leaf area index during the growing season are consistent with the truncated expolinear and Beta models. So that the parameter wmax at the first, second and third sowing dates at 16-64 plants m-2 in weed free conditions, ranged from 154.90-371.70, 119.60-310.80 and 60.87-187.90 g Dry matter m-2 and in weed infested condition ranged from 98.69-266.60, 56.78-186.90 and 35.53-114.00 g dry matter m-2. Regarding the lmax parameter, at the first, second and third sowing dates at 16-64 plants m-2 in weed free conditions, ranged from 0.49-9.32, 0.46-7.97, 0.39-4.50 g and in infested conditions 0.39-6.25, 0.69-5.18 and 0.21-2.79 g was estimated. Weed dry weight increased in weed infected plots over time. So that weeds dry weight on 28 February were more than other sowing dates. Also, the highest percentage of yield loss occurred in the second planting date at a density of 16 plants per square meter. In general, the first sowing date with density of 48 plants m -2 with a yield of 1703.327 kg ha-1 of chickpea was the best treatment compared to the same sowing density at the second sowing date (1534.7 kg ha-1) and the third sowing date (470.55 kg ha-1).

Conclusion:
In the present study, the maximum dry matter and the leaf area index of chickpea plants were decreased in weed infested conditions compared to weed free conditions in all three sowing dates. So that the reduced values in the less sowing densities were more than the higher sowing densities. In the other words, by increasing the planting density in the presence of weeds, the farmer will be able to avoid a significant reduction in the yield loss due to competition with weeds. By comparing the sowing dates of chickpea in terms of maximum dry matter, leaf area index and yield loss percentage of chickpea plants, it can be stated that the conditions for chickpea growth and development in the first sowing date were better than the other sowing date.

Keywords


  1. Asghari, J., Zareei, B., and Barzegari, M. 2006. Effect of plant density and planting pattern on growth parameters and yield of two promising corn hybrids (Zea mays L.). Agri. Sci. Technol. 20: 123-133.
  2. Begna, S.H., Hamilton, R.I., Dwyer, L., Stewart, D.W., Cloutier, D., Assemat, L., Foroutan-pour, K., and Smith, D.L. 2009. Weed biomass production response to plant spacing and corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids differing in canopy architecture. Weed Technol. 15: 647-65.
  3. Benjamin, J.G., and Nielsen, D.C. 2006. Water deficit effects on root distribution of soybean, field pea and chickpea. Field Crop Res. 97: 248-253.
  4. Blackshaw, R.E. 1993. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) density and row spacing effects on competition with green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci. 41: 403-408.
  5. Chauhan, B.S. 2012. Weed ecology and weed management strategies for dry-seeded rice in Asia. Weed Technol. 26: 1-13.
  6. Chauhan, B.S., and Johnson, D.E. 2011. Row spacing and weed control timing affect yield of aerobic rice. Field Crops Res. 121: 226-231.
  7. Datta, A., Sindel, B.M., Jessop, R.S., Kristiansen, P., and Felton, W.L. 2007. Phytotoxic response and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) genotypes with pre-emergence application of isoxaflutole. Aust. J. Exp. Agri. 47: 1460-1467.
  8. Derakhshan, A., Gherekhloo, J., and Bagherani, N. 2015. Effect of row spacing and herbicide application on the growth indices, yield and yield components of rice in direct seeding. J. Crop Prod. 8: 31-49. (In Persian)
  9. Drew, E., Vadakattua, G., and Lawrence, L. 2006. Herbicide limit nitrogen fixation ability farming ahead. Crop Puls. 176: 28-30.
  10. FAO. 2017. Statistical Databases. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat3.fao.org.
  11. Fernandez, O.N., Vignolio, O.R., and Requesens, E.C. 2002. Competition between corn (Zea mays L.) and bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L.) in relation to crop plant arrangement. Agronomie, 22: 293-305.
  12. Ghadiryan, R., Soltani, A., Zeinali, E., Kalateh Arabi, M., and Bakhshandeh, E. 2011. Evaluating non-linear regression models for use in growth analysis of wheat. J. Crop Prod. 4: 55-77. (In Persian)
  13. Gholapor Shamami, Y., Majnoonhoseini, N., and Alizade, H. 2013. Effects of various weed management methods and crop density on weed control and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crop Sci. 44: 563-574. (In Persian)
  14. Gaur, P.M., Tripathi, S., Gowda, C.L.L., Ranga Rao, G.V., Sharma, H.C., Pande, S., and Sharma, M. 2010. Chickpea Seed Production Manual. Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research. Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 28 p.
  15. Guadrian, J., and Monteith, J.L. 1990. A mathematical function for crop growth based on light interception and leaf area expansion. Ann Bot. 66: 695-701.
  16. Liebman, M., Mouler, C.L., and Staver, C.P. 2004. Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds. Cambridge University Press, UK. 523 p.
  17. Matov, A., Zahiri, R., and Holloway, J.D. 2008. The Heliothinae of Iran (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Zootaxa, 1763: 1-37.
  18. Mazaheri, M., and Ilagh Chaghakhour, A. 2010. Effect of plant density and row spacing on some morphological characteristics, yield and seed protein content of two chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. J. Manag. Syst. 2: 97-107.
  19. Mohler, C.L. 1996. Ecological bases for the cultural control of annual weeds. J Prod Agric. 9: 468-474.
  20. Mousavi, S.K., and Ahmadi, A. 2009. Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) yield and yield components to sowing date, plant density, and weed interference in dry land conditions of Lorestan province. J. Plant Protec. 23: 1-13. (In Persian)
  21. Mousavi, S.K., Sabeti, P., Jafarzadeh, N., and Bazzazi, D. 2010. Evaluation of some herbicides efficacy for weed control in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Iranian J. Puls Res. 1: 19-31. (In Persian)
  22. Parsa, M., and Bagheri, A. 2008. Pulses. Mashhad Univ. Press, 523p. (In Persian)
  23. Patel, B.D., Patel, V.J., and Patel, R.B. 2006. Effect of fertilizers and weed management practices on weed control in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under middle Gujarat conditions. Indian J. Crop Sci. 1: 180-183.
  24. Poustini, K., and Yazdi-Smadi, B. 1992. Yield responses of chickpea cultivars to dry-land conditions. Iranian J. Agri. Sci. 23: 11-18. (In Persian)
  25. Regan, K.L., Siddiqe, K.H.M., and Martin, L.D. 2003. Response of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to sowing rate in the Mediterranean type environments of southwestern Australia. Aust. J. Exp. Agri. 43: 84-97.
  26. Soltani, A., Robertson, M.J., Rahimi-Karizaki, A., Poorreza, J., and Zarei, H. 2006. Modelling biomass accumulation and partitioning in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Agron Crop Sci. 192: 379-389.
  27. Whish, J.P.M., Sindel, B.M., Jessop, R.S., and Felton, W.L. 2002. The effects of row spacing and weed density on yield loss of chickpea. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 53: 1335-1340.
  28. Yin, X., Goudriaan, J., Lantinga, E.A., Vos, J., and Spiertz, J.H. 2003. A flexible sigmoid growth function of determinate growth. Ann Bot. 91: 361-371.