Influence some agronomical factors on the Critical Period of Weed Control in Soybean

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Faculty Member

Abstract

Background and objectives. The critical period of weed control (CPWC) refers to a part of crop growing season in which weeds should be removed in order to prevent maximum crop loss due to weed competition. Major factors which can influence the CPWC are planting date, cultivar and crop density. Planting date is impressive on the weed-crop interference. Soybean cultivars are different from the viewpoint of competition with each other. This subject maybe related to competitive or allopathic characteristics. Crop plant density also has an inhibitory effect on the weed density. About these factors have not done any study.
Material and Methods. This research was done in two separates experiment in a field that located in Sari Dashte Naz agronomical company. The first experiment done in split plot factorial and RCB design with three replications in 2013. Treatments were planting date in two levels (5 June and 24 June) as main factor and cultivar in two levels (033 and Agili) and weeding (with 12 weeding time) in factorial interactions as sub factor. Second experiment with split plot form, two factors in RCB format and three replications operated. First factor was planting density in two levels (31 and 42 p m-2) and second factor was different management (removal and weedy treatments). Treatments were placed in two groups based on soybean growth stages in both study. In the first set, the crop was kept weed-free until the growth stages of emergence, 1-trifoliate, 3-trifoliate, 5-trifoliate and flowering. The beginning and end of the CPWC based on 5% loss of the marketable seed loss, was determined by fitting Logistic and Gompertz equations to the relative yield data representing increasing duration of weed interference and weed-free period for three factors.
Results. According to 5% acceptable yield loss beginning of CPWC for early and late planting date estimated 29 and 359 Degree Day After Planting(DDAP) and ending of CPWC were 1678 and 1258 DDAP. Appropriate sooner opportunity such as irrigation and fertilization in early planting , gave more time to weeds in order to germination and competition with soybean and resulted in become longer CPWC. Mean weed density was 77 p m-2 and dominant species were Velvetleaf, Black nightshade and Redroot Pigweed. The beginning of CPWC was uniform for both cultivars but duration CPWC was longer in Agili. 033 had more growth rate and could close sooner canopy. For these reasons its CPWC was shorter. With increasing crop density there was not any CPWC. This finding was described through weed density reduction especially redroot pigweed which required to light for germinating.
Conclusion. Differences in CPWC due to planting date documented in this study highlight the need for a greater understanding of environmental factors affecting competition for limited resources. A practical implication is that EARLY soybean requires more intensive weed management than LATE soybean, at least in the north-east Iran. On the whole late planting with more density and using 033 cultivar, not only can reduce herbicide dose but also deduct risk injury to the next crop in rotation.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1.Ahmadvand, G., Mondani, F., and Golzardi, F. 2009. Effect of crop plant density on critical
period of weed competition in potato. Sci. Hort. 121: 249-254.
2.Asghari, J., and Cheraghi, G.R. 2003. The critical period of weed control in two late and
medium maturities grain maize (Zea mays) cultivars. Iran. J. Crop. Sci. 4: 285-301. (In
Persian)
3.Asghari, J., Khoshnam, M., and Rabiei, M. 2010. Comparison of critical period of weed
control in two planting distances on yield of Canola (Brassica napus L.). J. Iran. Soc. Weed.
Sci. 2: 41-55.
4.Barjasteh, A.R., and Rahimian, H. 2006. The critical period of weed control in sorghum
(Sorghum bicolor). J. Agric. Sci. Nat. Resour. 12: 109-119. (In Persian)
5.Baskin, J.M., and Carol, C.C. 1980. Ecophysiology of secondary dormancy in seeds of
Ambrosia artemisifolia. Ecol. 61: 475-480.
6.Chauhan, B.S., and Johnson, D.E. 2011. Row spacing and weed control timing affect yield of
aerobic rice. Field. Crops. Res. 121: 226-231.
7.Eftekhari, A., Shirani Rad, A.H., Rezae, A.M., Salehian, H., and Ardakani, M. 2005. Estimation
critical period of weed control in soybean. Iran. J. Crop. Sci. 7: 347-364. (In Persian)
8.Ehteshami, S., and Chaeechi, M.R. 2001. Effect of time of hand weeding on species complex,
density, and weight of weeds in canola (Brassica napus). Iran. J. Agric. 32: 25-30. (In
Persian)
9.Ghersa, C.M., Benech Arnold, R.L., and Martinez-Ghersa, M.A. 1992. The role of fluctuating
temperatures in germination and establishment of Sorghum halepense. Funct. Ecol. 6: 460-
468.
10.Gower, S.A., Loux, M.M., Cardina, J., and Harrison, S.K. 2002. Effect of planting date,
residual herbicide, and post emergent application timing on weed control and grain yield in
glyphosate- tolerant corn. Weed. Technol. 16: 488-494.
11.Halford, C.J. 1998. Critical period of weed control for no- till field corn (Zea mays L.) and
(Glycine max L.) on two soil types in South Western Ontario. M.Sc. thesis. University of
Western Ontario, London.
12.Halford, C., Hamill, A.S., Zhang, J., and Doucet, C. 2001. Critical period of weed control in
no-till soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 15: 737-744.
13.Hall, M.R., Swanton, C.J., and Anderson, G.W. 1992. The critical period of weed control in grain
corn (Zea mays). Weed. Sci. 40: 441- 447.
14.Hamzei, J., Dabbagh Mohammady Nasab, A., Rahimzadeh Khoie, F., Javanshir, A., and
Moghaddam, M. 2007. Critical period of weed control in three winter oilseed rape (Brassica
napus) cultivars. Turk. J. Agric. 31: 83-90.
15.Huarte, H.R., and Benech Arnold, R.L. 2003. Understanding mechanisms of reduced annual
weed emergence in alfalfa. Weed. Sci. 51: 876-885.
16.Khakzad, R., Valiolahpoor, R., Gholipori, A., and Nazari, N.M. 2013. Evaluation the effects
of sowing date, cultivars and herbicides on different weed species and soybean (Glycine max
L.) yield. Plant. Prot. 27: 351-367.
17.Knezevic, S.Z., Evans, S.P., Blankenship, E.E., Van Acker, R.C., and Lindquist, J.L. 2002.
critical period for weed control: The concept and data analysis. Weed. Sci. 50: 773-786.
18.Knezevic, S.Z., Evans, S.P., and Mainz, M. 2003. Row spacing influences the critical timing
for weed removal in soybean (Glycine max). Weed. Technol. 17: 666-673.
19.Kordbache, F., Rahimian Mashhadi, H., and Beheshtian Mesgaran, M. 2011. Effect of
canopy cover in corn on sprouting in eight weed species. Iran. J. Field. Crop. Res., 2: 167-
175.
20.Lemerle, D., Verbeek, B., Cousens, R.D., and Coombes, N.E. 1996. The potential for
selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds. Weed. Res. 36: 505-513.
21.Lemerle, D., Verbeek, B., and Orchard, B. 2001. Ranking the ability of wheat varieties to
compete with Lolium rigidum L. Weed. Res. 41: 197-209.
22.Leon-Gonzalez, R.G., and Owen, D.K. 2002. Effect of light and temperature interaction seed
dormancy. North Central Weed Science Society, Abstracts, 57: 121-124.
23.Magor, D.J. 1980. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 60: 773-784.
24.Mc Donald, A.J., Riha, S.J., and Mohler, C.L. 2004. Mining the record: historical evidence
for climatic influences on maize- Abutilon theophrasti competition. Weed. Sci. 44: 439-445.
25.Mohler, C.L., and Calloway, M.B. 1992. Effect of tillage and mulch on the emergence and
survival of weeds in sweet corn. J. Appl. Ecol. 29: 21-34.
26.Mousavi Nik, A., Rahimian Mashhadi, H., Jodakhanloo, A., Ghavidel, A., and Jahnian, A.
2008. The effect of day and night tillage on weed emergence. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi. 78:
194-199.
27.Mulugeta, D., and Boerboom, C.M. 2000. Critical time of weed removal in Glyphosateresistant
Glycine max. Weed. Sci. 48: 35-42.
28.Oryokot, J.O.E., and Swanton, C.J. 1997. Effect of tillage and corn on pigweed (Amaranthus
spp) seedling emergence and density. Weed. Sci. 45: 120-126.
29.Pedersen, P., and Lauer, G. 2004. Response of soybean yield components to management
system and planting date. Agron. J. 96: 1372-1381.
30.Ragabian, M., Asghari, J., Ehteshami, M.R., and Rabie, M. 2009. Plant density effect in the
critical period of weed control in rape seed (Brassica napus) at Rasht region. Iran. J. Weed.
Sci. 5: 13-30. (In Persian)
31.Rajcan, I., Chandler, K.J., and Swanton, C.J. 2004. Red: far-red ratio of reflected light: a
hypothesis of why early-season weed control is important in corn. Weed. Sci. 52: 774-778.
32.Rezvani, H., Latifi, N., and Zeinali, E. 2009. Determination of critical period for Velvetleaf
(Abutilon theophrasti) control in summer seeded soybean, Williams cultivar. Electron. J.
Crop. Prod. 2: 45-65.
33.Salehian, H., and Jamshidi, M. 2016. Crop rotation effects on the critical period of weed
control in canola. Electron. J. Crop. Prod. 2: 111-126.
34.Salimi, H., Bazoubandi, M., and Fereidoonpour, M. 2011. Investigating different methods of
integrated weed management in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). EJCP. 1: 187-197.
35.Tursun, N., Datta, A., Budak, S., Kantarci, Z., and Knezevic, S.Z. 2016. Row spacing
impacts the critical period for weed control in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Phytoparasitica.
44: 139-149.
36.Van Acker, R.C., and Swanton, C.G. 1993. The critical period of weed control in soybean
(Glycine max L.). Weed. Sci. 41: 194-200.
37.Webster, M., Grey, T.L., Flanders, J.T., and Culpepper, A.S. 2009. Cotton planting date
affects the critical period of Benghal Dayflower (Commelina benghalensis) control. Weed.
Sci. 57: 81-86.
38.Williams, M. 2006. Planting date influences critical period of weed control in sweet corn.
Weed. Sci. 54: 928-933.
39.Yaghobi, S.R. 2005. Evalution of critical period of weed control in western Tehran. MSc.
Thesis, Department of Agronomy, college of Agriculture, University of Mazandaran, Sari.
(In Persian)
40.Zimdahl, R.L. 1988. The concept and application of weed free period. Pp: 145-155. In weed
management in agro ecosystem. Ecological Approaches (Eds MA. Altieri and M. Leibman. CRC
Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
41.Zimdahl, R.L. 2013. Fundamental of Weed Science. Fourth ed. Elsevier Inc, U.S.A., 631p.